Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

From: Stig Venaas via Datatracker <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:00:44 -0800

Reviewer: Stig Venaas
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed the document and it is in good shape.

The document has a few nits found by the idnits tool. The string "RFC" should
not be included when specifing "obsoletes:" or "updates:". Also the abstract
mentions that the documents obsoletes or updates documents that are not listed
by the obsoletes/updates headers.

In 3.1.1.4. paragraph 4:
"participation for those unable to to attend in person."
Double "to".

I'm wondering whether any of the references should be normative, but it may not
make sense for this document.