Subject: [saag] LAMPS Summary

From: Russ Housley <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:26:38 -0500

Three documents are with the RFC Editor or the IESG:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update
  b)  draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms
  c)  draft-ietf-lamps-samples

The CMP-related documents need one more revision, and then they will be ready for WG Last Call:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates
  b)  draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile

The S/MIME-related documents are moving slowly, but during IETF 112, a way forward was selected:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection
  b)  draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

The assignment for a document-signing extended key usage object identifier is under consideration.  It has strong support and strong opposition too.  A call for adoption will determine whether there is consensus to move forward:
  a)  draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Clarification is needed to RFC 7030 and the handling of attributes in the certificate signing request (CSR).  During IETF 112, a way forward was selected:
  a)  draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs (Michael)

Documents for using PQC in certificates and CMS are getting started.  The first one failed to meet the cut-off deadline; it is related to NIST PQC KEM public keys in certificates.  Others are looking at the combination of traditional algorithms with PQC algorithms:
  a)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-encryption
  b)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-keys
  c)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-sigs
  d)  draft-ounsworth-pq-explicit-composite-keys