Subject: X.509

From: Oskari Saarenmaa <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:45:37 +0200

I recently submitted a new individual draft for ssh x509 which backs
down from what we specified in the latest WG draft, and just specifies
how we use certificates in our implementations.  It's available at
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-saarenmaa-ssh-x509-00.txt

Any thoughts?

/ Oskari

---

From: Roumen Petrov <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:02:50 +0200

Please check names like :

"x509v3-sign-rsa-sha1"(key name) and "ssh-rsa"(signature format name) vs "x509v3-sign-rsa"
Same for DSA.

Roumen