Subject: Re: [sfc] SFC WG Agenda: London

From: "Jeffrey Napper (jenapper)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 19:07:17 +0000

Hello Jim & Thomas,

We recently submitted a draft with use cases specific to mobility. We plan to submit a revised version for London with input from other authors and any feedback from the list (please feel free to provide more!). Could we get a slot in the session to discuss it?

Requested details:

1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haeffner-sfc-use-case-mobility/

2) The draft relates mostly to the problem statement and uses case deliverables.

3) We are certainly interested in the draft providing the use cases specifically for mobility service chaining. Whether our draft (if it is ultimately supported) becomes a WG deliverable or is included in a single use case deliverable depends on how the group decides to produce use cases as recents posts have discussed. My impression is that the list has not quite decided on the exact list of use case documents yet.

Cheers,
Jeff & Walter

From: "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Saturday, February 1, 2014 at 6:23 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [sfc] SFC WG Agenda: London

Greetings,

It's time to start putting together an agenda for the SFC meeting in London. We've requested one 2.5 hour slot . Because face-to-face time is precious, we intend to focus on:

- WG chartered items for which we have WG-adopted IDs, or IDs that appear headed for WG adoption.

- Specific topics where feedback is needed, and mailing list discussions have not converged.

We also do not intend to give agenda time to everyone who has a draft - the WG sessions do not have time for that, nor is it necessarily an effective use of time. We also do not intend to give agenda time for drafts for which little or no mailing list interest has been generated.

For the upcoming session, we expect to focus on:

1) Problem satement (hopefully not much time needed -- are there any actual open issues?).

2) Use cases.

3) Architecture.

If you have a draft (or plan to submit one) and would like to present (or more specifically, would like the working group to do something with your draft), please:

1) Let us know now (even if the draft is not published yet), so we can start planning;

2) Indicate which WG deliverable the draft relates to; and

3) Indicate what you want the WG to do with your draft. E.g., do you want this to become "THE" WG document for a particular deliverable? Or, is there content in the document you believe should be added to another document? etc. Please do not just respond "I want it to become a WG document". It would be better to explain in what context, and how your draft relates to other drafts that have been submitted.

Thanks!

Thomas & Jim