Subject: [sfc] 전달: New Version Notification for draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01.txt

From: 강태호(SDN Project) <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:08:32 +0000

Hi,

We updated our draft.

Comments are reflected and some minor typo are updated.

Thanks.

Best Regards,

Taeho

[http://massmail.kt.com/NameCardImage/NameCardFiles/20147/a1066ba0-c699-4101-9c8c-3fbe430c6413.png]
________________________________________
보낸 사람: [email-masked]
보낸 날짜: 2015년 10월 20일 화요일 오전 12:01:00
받는 사람: 백은경(SDNFV TF); 백은경(SDNFV TF); 강태호(SDN Project); 김성수(SDN Project); 강태호(SDN Project); 김성수(SDN Project); 김남곤(NFV Project); 김남곤(NFV Project); 한영태(Cloud Infra Project); 한영태(Cloud Infra Project)
제목: New Version Notification for draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Taeho Kang and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection
Revision: 01
Title: Dynamic Service Path Selection over Multiple Links between SFF and SF for Enhancing Service Stability
Document date: 2015-10-19
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 9
URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection/
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kang-sfc-dynamic-path-selection-01

Abstract:
In this document, we use SF classification of 1)indispensible SF for
packet delivery, allegedly mandatory SFs, such as NAT and 2)optional
SFs that a packet can be delivered without them, such as Firewall and
IDS.

The nodes of SFC-enabled domain can be various. Different vendors
make different types of equipments, and this causes performance
issues. Considering this diversity, the kind of SFs can be in myriad
form. Thus, we should distinguish some mandatory SFs from not
mandatory SFs and treat distinctively. Mandatory SFs should be
matched with higher-performance SFF to achieve high availability as
well as lower the probability of failure. Above all, whether each SF
is mandatory or optional should be registered in advance. Mandatory
SFs are to allocated to relatively higher-performance, larger
capacity, more stable SFFs. SFC constructed using this way of
allocation becomes the path for packets and packets are transferred
to classifier through C1 interface, and to SFF through C2 interface,
respectively.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에 포함된 정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못 전송된 경우, 발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다.
This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you receive this email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing, distributing or retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately.