Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit)

From: Akshaya Nadahalli <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:13:45 +0530

I support the publishing of this draft as an Experimental RFC.

Regards,
Akshaya N

>     > From: sfc <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
>     > Sent: Dienstag, 16. Juni 2020 15:42
>     > To: [email-masked]
>     > Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF WG state changed for
> draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit
>     >
>     > The chairs are starting the WG last call for
> draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit.  Please
>     > reply explicitly whether you think this is ready to go to the IETF
> for publication as
>     > a Experimental RFC.
>     > As noted below, the call runs through June 30.
>     >
>     > Note that silence does not imply consent, so please speak up.
>     >
>     > Yours,
>     > Joel (& Jim)
>     >
>     > On 6/16/2020 9:32 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>     > >
>     > > The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit has been
> changed
>     > > to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:
>     > >
>     > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit/
>     > >
>     > > Comment:
>     > > This starts WG last call for this document, ending June 30.
>     > >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > sfc mailing list
>     > [email-masked]
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>
>
>