From nobody Mon Feb 8 09:12:44 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2082A3A138B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNgpblUutJ_E for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645A43A10F6 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r75so2740666oie.11 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4UATMWJZNu/fYqY3Eibp/MqVNzcSIiiqwa1aHylNke4=; b=I4AL4/P+9JZICNvH4kOIkkIvOptpP7JhgjUdclHTqc7Uak9gSQOfDJI1//GQaUfbsJ LIoCSaIUPlEmVBm5eluyPkjDS8/W8DOAmBm4i5CiOKPrizS2lBWtBzDYdzBve0/0szIE 4+Pu5BmJmUvbXsSdF9vSBhu9CXKLEfI8Mh2GzFo6Og07rNkU1X57mtnhVMn8J4B/TiBl BSTOMDo7FH5w8Ml8NRYBad78XfbVG0KoUfIjFYgt82Kyd26c1XYsPopzH/shFtJgwS5k Sa5gG0jkGq/ug3dIdi0npfLtz7PZdUGsdM02HWslzDfz2anPRs1pab/Fc33Z4Ykj0vjw Ky/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4UATMWJZNu/fYqY3Eibp/MqVNzcSIiiqwa1aHylNke4=; b=WSl5B3EBHixRP5gUkTPbrzU1rQTKEgMkIlDDNXNsuhGn+Q5dbeWqkjCZwuo9urUnIk Ps3pmVHKYX15/J9hfeAkDNctyhWkYZJprTrBDBVOEopQFT5+LJXCcfY2eCtYQqTKEMNE lzNSldYqu0mtcVgkBn3RIEESUX1KBFdxUh2aUNG98yLD599KfFNtez9lqHP2nFiXqoJv doQ/gQOLixBeh4xWrz6xf7WRkk/8cmZ+LlMtgZDkwftRBrXQoR2pq96UjZlQouf7r1YI gwyCYKiwVaRmdZRhE4B83c4s6ss0CBUha4hHnco0pT67ELlV8bdJc4lGpTAYrcFjZAD0 dCbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Wsn2dQHoxcLR5qZczHlc9LIwxX+M57JuOnC9j+UMUCTXT6MUX Udg0Dr4Ti4MV1kK/DwltOvS0sdeip+SDiqlr5gc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4belZxDYl1LOvek3hU7gt16FHNGZmuru7FZn9dPGU4C/eH8GJvfeEG9mSdy0U0XfWGkjcol9pCnBkQrA/Ivo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:65a:: with SMTP id z26mr7080741oih.87.1612804360404; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:12:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Bobo Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:25:17 -0800 Message-ID: To: Sergio murillo Cc: sframe@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fe814205bad6464a" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sframe] SFrame Draft - IETF 109 Follow Up X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:12:43 -0000 --000000000000fe814205bad6464a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks for the update, Sergio! Gently reminding others to please chime in with any additional concerns and suggestions for improvement to the draft. Thanks, Bobo On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, 3:01 AM Sergio murillo < sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io> wrote: > Hi Bobo, > > Regarding the generic packetization and IDU support, the work has already > started on the AVTCore group and Youenn and I have already started to > prepare the initial draft of the generic packetization format. > > Best regards > Sergio > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:06 PM Bobo wrote: > >> All, >> >> The Chairs have reviewed the discussion of draft-omara-sframe at IETF >> 109. While there was some support for adoption, it seems like there are >> enough people with reservations that we aren't comfortable saying that >> there is consensus to adopt yet. >> >> In the interests of making progress, we'd like to ask those with concerns >> to let us know what those concerns are. Some explanation of how you think >> those concerns might best be addressed would be appreciated. >> >> Much of what we heard seemed to be around the generic packetization/IDU >> implementation, and on fixing or removing the header authentication scheme. >> >> Our goal here is to have the next revision of the draft address those >> concerns. We hope to raise the question of adoption at that point. >> >> Thanks, >> Bobo (for the Chairs) >> -- >> Sframe mailing list >> Sframe@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe >> > --000000000000fe814205bad6464a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the update, Sergio!

=
Gently reminding others to please chime in with any= additional concerns and suggestions for improvement to the draft.

Thanks,
B= obo


On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, 3:01 AM Sergio murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.= io> wrote:
= Hi Bobo,

Regarding the generic=C2=A0packetization and ID= U support, the work has already started on the AVTCore group and Youenn and= I have already started to prepare the initial draft of the generic packeti= zation format.

Best regards
Sergio

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:06 PM Bobo <the.bobo@gmail.com> wro= te:
All,

The Chairs have reviewed the discussion of draft-omara-sframe at = IETF 109.=C2=A0 While there was some support for adoption, it seems like th= ere are enough people with reservations that we aren't comfortable sayi= ng that there is consensus to adopt yet.

<= div dir=3D"auto">In the interests of making progress, we'd like to ask = those with concerns to let us know what those concerns are.=C2=A0 Some expl= anation of how you think those concerns might best be addressed would be ap= preciated.=C2=A0=C2=A0

M= uch of what we heard seemed to be around the generic packetization/IDU impl= ementation, and on fixing or removing the header authentication scheme.

Our goal here is to have th= e next revision of the draft address those concerns.=C2=A0 We hope to raise= the question of adoption at that point.

<= div dir=3D"auto">Thanks,
Bobo (for the Chairs)
=
--
Sframe mailing list
Sfr= ame@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe<= /a>
--000000000000fe814205bad6464a-- From nobody Fri Feb 12 16:37:35 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietf.org Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0483A124E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:33:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Secretariat\"" To: , Cc: sframe@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <161317641150.31337.12484100677717269528@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:33:31 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Sframe] sframe - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 110 X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:33:40 -0000 Dear Martin Thomson, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. sframe Session 1 (1:00 requested) Tuesday, 9 March 2021, Session II 1530-1630 Room Name: Room 2 size: 502 --------------------------------------------- iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/sessions/sframe.ics Request Information: --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Secure Media Frames Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area Session Requester: Martin Thomson Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1 Hour Number of Attendees: 30 Conflicts to Avoid: Chair Conflict: quic tls webtrans wpack httpbis dispatch Technology Overlap: avtcore People who must be present: Bobo Bose-Kolanu Martin Thomson Murray Kucherawy Resources Requested: Special Requests: I assume that the conflict tool manages the conflicts of the responsible area director and so I won't include the email groups that were listed last time. --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Wed Feb 24 19:30:50 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356BD3A0E27 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=jrjRIQeT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Gvv0oqCQ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhsrhiWC8a_n for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420E63A0E1F for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09635C008D for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm1; bh=BdYSgQJBJbQgQ5JndVUhsOh9nAso/OZjkfLuu8Jc1GA=; b=jrjRIQeT 5xMjg7XH2LLYh1ow2mi+EQ+82OqK3UGCiu/N2O7bVxy0Mv1l/GLj8xgk6DkF5fvr sdbxhkgQjpzKilYl9GC08xHNBVZM9F2Ychl2wya/6F5CaaRfAoivLZupg0/UPlRA Rch2n4qbTM1vbTiLd/deXSP1GqaahHZUZYVHjcu/BQ9Mq/WKxRIXf/2sV4xYMm5+ AWwjMlKZrvwushYSe9dTeQlR+uPBJaEyhZ1H/4dV4mMfExFArIcE6sAEMzOg5pE1 hpWvii8qYLRuY3ARGyYIEOjhjlEYgIxbLWI/elw667hHZfA1fBqEhR61eyf1b3tq aojK4sGLuA1lpg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BdYSgQJBJbQgQ5JndVUhsOh9nAso/ OZjkfLuu8Jc1GA=; b=Gvv0oqCQzon4N3pONDZYRzy2y3knec7HDGWDt2fKAM/nd FJK7Ogyyp+tISWg7OZU4UPDhia4cGsEwIXAC2NOzXVKiT0rItkR/RmwtN6eBlGab kfreN4kXo8UWJZrNTtCb0KokczEymLxPYT5L9/RTFpRBzOaVnDhi+GwrujP4ndq1 9SYpldt1Rt/h1F/zPaTpTkMPKv1Ob8Zd5a1Y8FblzZxTr3SblqFxkl/CurUjsjP+ Yol8kcX85VceTb1jOni7uN/+xYvQ3GzykzxMwbOde+0EfJrqQ9gVOdwyJzs0np3U JzcnxO0kP5XkHrL19zWZt63HG19cduyIVyR11PnsQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeekgdehlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghn thhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvefguddtgfejfeduueehkeehke duueegheefgeevkeekgeelveevffeuudffheehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1EA4F4E0137; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:30:45 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <27a24a63-b3bd-42dd-823d-7b3143fb8a3b@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:30:24 +1100 From: "Martin Thomson" To: sframe@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain Archived-At: Subject: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110 X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:30:49 -0000 It has been a little quiet here lately, but I understand that there are still people working. The chairs would like your help with making the meeting at IETF 110 successful. We have a 1 hour at 1530 (UTC+1) on Tuesday (2021-03-02). The issue that seems most pressing is how the framework interacts with packetization and the way in which we decide what is and isn't protected. It seems like we have made some progress in that area, but at the last meeting some people were not sufficiently happy with the current state of the documentation. The chairs would like to spend our meeting time discussing this issue with the goal of resolving on a general strategy that can be documented in a framework document. If you think that you can help us reach a resolution on this issue, we're seeking volunteers to lead the discussion. It need not be a single person. If there are other issues you would like discussed during the meeting, reply to this message with a request. We will discuss what time we can make available. For the chairs, Martin From nobody Wed Feb 24 23:36:14 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B933A14C4 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cosmosoftware-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2ZxVFL4nZl7 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214D63A0C94 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id o10so3233306pgg.4 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cosmosoftware-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LUJt+fgc6dN63xmlmVpvEWRchFmRIPjfTFgVy1D08NU=; b=fU+Xy4lwIiEK8GQz66rKxjhmGyxpF5X6foSv9+nrJ+SU5MM8yh09e18JgSlHED2Hxx XppJUgIj1sh4V5ELwBc70ZhRCn5mnSWzRTQRnSIhRUQBFAvwjpqCdHJ3w4mp3owCIgkG GQQMch7igi/IdaJ2iecg6WSOjh7dClTSE1PEyyaxp+IVlt7u5yF8zy1KktoiKMYz1bEr C6ybHHb1cr5ACm25rVUgrSwqTWntJQ+j9j9Rpgn+AIV9zDFJjSefb7wO4i6z8UnToImV MyMysl9IxEHE4HhzZIe1+FD7PjNJceQIZFZ4h5AWWq9Cd2xjLr4xFDukKR857Wn5tOy0 79PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LUJt+fgc6dN63xmlmVpvEWRchFmRIPjfTFgVy1D08NU=; b=PA9ADEnpiramgCy+05tBB1H7kogCinkKdJNc9o0OIrAK1i/08gzHTQMqFoMSmiIPlH zEkqluEWh5RmiG0HR+0PnVi3Kb8Qv+zZ+5mDtDMdEbsiEbXFpIR5oeTqLq7JCo3hFBox Sv7a5Le6a8OroO9qEsL6wWW8I9stbzgCDMir5dFD7wFBK44te6C9/gH7ytx0NaVBRxPY oXTbcRZ2CXdD6Yqd6yQYENjyBS2AOXRzRRxpQgby63zlGVeoj2FUwiA108pm07yZ0YSu LVfexJ2sihEX3inFDyV+WJZiYoKiMyqxas4sdusJ+OPPT7hzE7/Wpy2kjTzLVcKO837S tjMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bui+CdICvjwOOu32PqKgrIGvJ8p2Mr/bJXgbMjly+SLvj7w0u oEfLoiyoiWhcJHCXXuq3e0DBDBMeLTbNSTwoxn+FJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztmqxVULC4mE5tmvyoLxDQ/bw/qry+hyHaqqeR/RvZC4X4KZUruXNhHZDEBI9Xb9p0k8/2LZCVxID19pav0Yg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2ac:b029:1e9:3cb7:324a with SMTP id q12-20020a056a0002acb02901e93cb7324amr2085268pfs.36.1614238571400; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <27a24a63-b3bd-42dd-823d-7b3143fb8a3b@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <27a24a63-b3bd-42dd-823d-7b3143fb8a3b@www.fastmail.com> From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:36:00 +0800 Message-ID: To: Martin Thomson Cc: sframe@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1a56705bc2434ea" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110 X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:36:13 -0000 --000000000000a1a56705bc2434ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > The issue that seems most pressing is how the framework interacts with > packetization and the way in which we decide what is and isn't protected. > It seems like we have made some progress in that area, but at the last > meeting some people were not sufficiently happy with the current state of > the documentation. > - A new draft has been submitted to AVTcore on the matter.I believe Sergio could present it. - I believe RichardB@Cisco has also made progress about MLS-Sfrane - I did not have time to finish a full informal I-D by the 2/22 deadline, but I have slides and drawings about the big picture, and I would be happy to present them as a base for discussion. --000000000000a1a56705bc2434ea Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The issue that= seems most pressing is how the framework interacts with packetization and = the way in which we decide what is and isn't protected.=C2=A0 It seems = like we have made some progress in that area, but at the last meeting some = people were not sufficiently happy with the current state of the documentat= ion.
=C2=A0
- A new draft has been submitted= to AVTcore on the matter.I believe Sergio could present it.

=
- I believe RichardB@Cisco has also made progress about MLS-Sfra= ne

- I did not have time to finish a full informal= I-D by the 2/22 deadline, but I have slides and drawings about the big pic= ture, and I would=C2=A0be happy to present them as a base for discussion.
--000000000000a1a56705bc2434ea-- From nobody Thu Feb 25 16:50:01 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8B13A134B for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:49:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=d1XJckAb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=tI5GzHw/ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8BfVyCjYe4T for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B063A134C for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CEC5C012F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:49:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:49:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=oBUYWRaZAgzd05ZV0MFg0rdUpQ5txcA 07DhYg9eHWYM=; b=d1XJckAbfNpt1wBGvKydkNXB1N9Z7K1HODhcIaYhRun7qyD +4kDCUkINDMqjRFNC5QdFyLH9zJafiy/eBVfD2AJLlAbQSessDPaHNRLrfs2Oo9V Pp2h7nzVOEitqyII0FOGID/4ZTVrxAR5yZqVN7Z9RZq9kyoGt7HamcRrJv87AaFd e3dfib6xyyvI7akIcp/nBHk3HJ2keJkRermLcp2FtXL+MJ0aUrQWfgbhmN4TbtHu WH7j3R1zDAPWuBx7JGsU+rGVuXzthPTrSvtx29pS5DRpWYG2+xDQ1uEdnM+VBK9k wHm6TzRtPsxXw1P4W+YEq167ypREuX2aqGqDKig== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=oBUYWR aZAgzd05ZV0MFg0rdUpQ5txcA07DhYg9eHWYM=; b=tI5GzHw/mygC/GNW5eNS5/ 8RaSsmimMZLTXD0qbkqgRvELKpN0oc3jJHxtsgHuqO5S8EtOyEko6VTk5E/iFmy/ aR0iZYKLVl+FRt8NNOM0WxtkRWd+RKGcofur21eWqWXmHaM1OtnIsU+6AAnI3dek Gzp6GtbrTRjqB0alTSmAXPhHToPaKgr66rJ7XyIwefTNn723mBib+YPqgVQLkOEV kqnmZ0XSIpHzGlDj8zq91TYdpR7Aj3FxIosV2U2nd3AwEimm4JbayUSZ9aEIJ9Kh nWydeuP+8Bu8V86wtalbMiClwmA0z7vELxfLVn3IeDWkqrNyOcKC4dSv2NrhTYVQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrledtgddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhht ihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefkeevhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeeg ffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9538C4E01D3; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:49:56 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <48139779-7192-42e5-8d7d-beea65982a6c@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <27a24a63-b3bd-42dd-823d-7b3143fb8a3b@www.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:49:36 +1100 From: "Martin Thomson" To: sframe@ietf.org, "Alexandre GOUAILLARD" , sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io Content-Type: text/plain Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110 X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:50:00 -0000 On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 18:36, Alexandre GOUAILLARD wrote: > - A new draft has been submitted to AVTcore on the matter.I believe > Sergio could present it. Maybe Sergio could start with a brief introduction of that work here as well. I don't think that I'm subscribed to avtcore, so I completely missed any mention of that. We might be able to find time for a presentation too. > - I did not have time to finish a full informal I-D by the 2/22 > deadline, but I have slides and drawings about the big picture, and I > would be happy to present them as a base for discussion. We'll make sure to get you some time then. Thanks Dr. Alex.