Subject: Re: [sidr] review/adoption of draft-george-sidr-as-migration

From: Warren Kumari <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:56:55 -0400

On May 29, 2013, at 9:59 AM, "George, Wes" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> All – I have not received any feedback regarding this draft since I posted the revision incorporating the solution into it in February.

Sorry. I promised another review, and then got sidetracked. 

I've finally done so, and sent nits (but nothing substantive) off-list.
> Perhaps it’s time to call WG adoption so that it can move forward?

If the chairs kicked this off, I'd support it. (To be honest, I though there had already been a CFA and i'd supported it…)

It described a real need, and provides a well described and (IMO) good solution.

W
>  
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-sidr-as-migration-01
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Wes George
> 
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

--
The plural of anecdote is not evidence.
        -- Bill Lockyer, California Attorney General