Subject: RE: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-partial-pidf-format-01.txt

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:50:09 +0300

Hi,

The reason for using "application/pidf-partial+xml" for full state
notifies is that "application/pidf-partial+xml" contains a "version"
attribute. This is needed to detect if some notifications have been lost
or if they have been reordered. If we would use "application/pidf+xml"
for full state notifies there would be no way to know the correct full
state presence state to which partial notifications should be applied
to.

- Mikko 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked]
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of ext AC Mahendran
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:02 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Simple] draft-ietf-simple-partial-pidf-format-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Why do we need the "state" attribute in
> "application/pidf-partial+xml". Why 
> can't we use the following general rule:
> 
> 1) Use "application/pidf-partial+xml" when you want to send
> partial state.
> 2) Use "application/pidf+xml" when you want to send complete state.
> 
> Thanks,
> AC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
> 

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple