Subject: RE: [Simple] common policy/ common policy caps schema issue

From: Eric Burger <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:27:34 -0400

At a certain point, one has to ask, "Why XML?", especially if we lose the
ability to leverage tools, verifiers, etc..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 9:12 AM
> To: [email-masked]'; Simple WG
> Subject: [Simple] common policy/ common policy caps schema issue
[snip]
> The only way I know to do this is to remove the usage of substitution 
> groups, and use the <xs:any> construct. This does mean that 
> the schema 
> validation cannot verify that new conditions, actions or 
> transformations 
> are appropriately placed in the document. But, I think this 
> is the price 
> we need to pay for the extensibility we need.

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple