Subject: AW: [Simple] Policies and Events

From: "Alexeitsev, D" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:47:33 +0200

Hello Jonathan

Thanks for the clarifications, a short summup inline.

>I don't see the problem here. There is a transition in the subscription 
>states (and thus the watcherinfo states) based on policy changes. 
>Perhaps you are asking for there to be a clear definition of the state 
>changes in the subscription states when policy documents are uploaded?

This is exactly the case, if the watcherinfo states would contain policy document fragments then the subscription state transition would be implicitly included in the policy documents.

I don't see a problem with the current solution where states and policies are separated as long as their relations are defined. 

My question was what is the main benefit of this separation apart from "That is how it works" ? :-)

Greetings,
Denis Alexeitsev

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple