Subject: [Simple] RE: Partial-PIDF and PRESCAPS-EXT

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 21:16:11 +0200

Hi,
 
Thanks for careful reading.
You are right. There is a bug in the examples. Correct namespace is urn:ietf:params:ns:pidf:servcaps. Will be fixed.
 
- Mikko

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Sharon Fridman [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: 04 November, 2004 20:55
To: Lonnfors Mikko (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Partial-PIDF and PRESCAPS-EXT

Hi!

The examples in section 7 use the namespace URN "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:servcaps" and "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:devcaps" relating to draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-02.

Prescaps section 7.1 indicates  URN "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:servcaps" with URI "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:status:servcaps" which is not consistent. Also the XML fragment uses the status format.

According to my understanding this draft specifically identify the service data as static characteristics (using the presence model terms) and thus require this to be child of <tuple> rather than <status> (as shown in the sample) and also using URN "ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:servcaps" (Section 3.2 of  prescaps-02).

Please advise,

-Fridy / Followap

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple