Subject: [Simple] IPR Claims against SIMPLE WG drafts

From: Hisham Khartabil <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:19:52 +0100

The first one is surprising. The second one is interesting (I'm one of 
the authors, but obviously not one of the inventors :). The third one 
is obsolete, I guess. The last one we all know about.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?&ipr_id=494
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?&ipr_id=330
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?&ipr_id=235
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?&ipr_id=422

Regards,
Hisham

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple