Subject: Re: [Simple] [MSRP chat] Issue 14: Normative text

From: Miguel Garcia <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:22:37 +0300

Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> 
> 
> Miguel Garcia wrote:
>> Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>  >>  Then the MSRP switch should inspect the To header field of the
>>  >>    Message/CPIM wrapper.  If the To header field of the Message/CPIM
>>  >>    wrapper contains the chat room URI, the MSRP switch can generate a
>>  >>    copy of the SEND request to each of the participants in the
>>  >>    conference except the sender.
>>  >
>>  > MUST generate a copy
> 
> Is this really mandatory? What about a participant that is in "sendonly" 
>  or "inactive" mode?
> 
> It seems that the To header value is input to the "mixer", but that the 
> mixing policy has some say in what to do as a result.

Point taken. I will revise the text to still have the normative text, 
perhaps as a SHOULD with collection of exceptions (sendonly/inactive, 
policy, etc.).

/Miguel

>     Paul

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Siemens Networks     Espoo, Finland

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple