Subject: Re: [Simple] Partial Publication of elements with more than oneinstance possible

From: Pankaj Munjal <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:22:44 +0530

Hello Colm,

Thanks for the clarification.
For <note> and <display-name> xml:lang can be used.
But how about <timed-status> element?
According to RFC 4481, Section 3:
"More than one such element MAY appear within   a PIDF <tuple> element."

In this case, what shall be the unique identifier for any instance of
"timed-status"?

Regards,
Pankaj

On 3/12/09, Smyth, Colm (Colm) <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Hi Panjaj,
>
> Each instance of <note> and <display-name> is distinguished by a locale
> (xml:lang).
>
> All the best,
> Colm Smyth
> Lead/Architect - Avaya Communication Manager <NG> Presence Server |
> Unified Communications
> AVAYA | [email-masked] | +353 1 656 7843 (x37843)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
> Of Pankaj Munjal
> Sent: 12 March 2009 06:15
> To: simple
> Subject: [Simple] Partial Publication of elements with more than
> oneinstance possible
>
> Hello all,
>
> According to the Presence RFCs, there can be a few elements like <note>,
> <cipid>-<display_name> that can have multiple entries.
> However, they don't have ids associated with them to identify the
> instances.
>
> If my client is using partial publish to change values of one of such
> instances, then which instance shall be updated on the Server?
> (Assuming that my initial PUBLISH had more than one instance for such
> field)
>
> Is this scenario documented in some RFC/draft?
>
> Kindly suggest!
>
> Regards,
> Pankaj
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>

-- 
All the desirable things in life are either illegal, expensive,
fattening, or married to someone else!!