From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Aug 16 00:42:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F521F8599; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:42:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.46 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myLJ1mTrsl5v; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55D821F85A7; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.33 Message-ID: <20120816074202.3585.35422.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:42:02 -0700 Cc: simple@ietf.org Subject: [Simple] I-D Action: draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:42:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Le= veraging Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : Multi-party Chat Using the Message Session Relay Protoco= l (MSRP) Author(s) : Aki Niemi Miguel A. Garcia-Martin Geir A. Sandbakken Filename : draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt Pages : 37 Date : 2012-08-16 Abstract: The Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) defines a mechanism for sending instant messages within a peer-to-peer session, negotiated using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Session Description Protocol (SDP). This document defines the necessary tools for establishing multi-party chat sessions, or chat rooms, using MSRP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-simple-chat There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-simple-chat-16 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-simple-chat-16 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com Thu Aug 16 01:18:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277CE21F84EE for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:18:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMIaQKYIM7y5 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A4921F8627 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7fd66d0000004ad-1d-502caccae088 Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 95.69.01197.ACCAC205; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [159.107.105.72] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.264.1; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:18:18 +0200 Message-ID: <502CACC8.40901@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:18:16 +0200 From: "Miguel A. Garcia" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simple WG References: <20120816074202.3585.56492.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120816074202.3585.56492.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20120816074202.3585.56492.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3VvfUGp0Ag76DZhYLJ/5jdWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvVnX1gKWrgqbs3axNjAeICji5GTQ0LAROL/8xssELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hAROMUr0L1jPDOGsYZRY8PwZYxcjBwevgKbE5+myIA0sAqoS285vZAex2QTMJVo3 QtiiAoESz2dvAbN5BQQlTs58ArZAREBe4sXsX0wgtrCAm8Slb1+ZQWwhAQeJOz3n2EBsTgFH icXLprNCHOQjcWvzWrB6ZgELicVvDrJD2PIS29/OgerVlJh8cynzBEbBWUjWzULSMgtJywJG 5lWMwrmJmTnp5YZ6qUWZycXF+Xl6xambGIFheXDLb90djKfOiRxilOZgURLn5Ura7y8kkJ5Y kpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qBkXFGuHvf2VuvApfqHFLh+rPd9rN0Ue8hs4Nfjn6oNNvk prjgz/sNf8L5IkvUTabOmaK6RTBpS/ehNiPTRO25531nWz9LS1eVYtrJP2OFgnru+pvXz297 9jbi963yL3cDXC2+5Fsdmq/S+t/Q/U/VrKdtsTHyk2fp7NB4eC53CaNQXurxkHlHLyuxFGck GmoxFxUnAgB1MLUoGQIAAA== Subject: [Simple] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:18:21 -0000 We have just submitted a new version of the SIMPLE chat draft. This version fixes an aligns the example of a notification from the conference event package (Section 9.6) with the published RFCs 6501 and 6502. In particular, 'nickname' is an attribute of . In older versions of these documents, nickname used to be an child element of . Besides, we have fixed a few nits revealed by idnits. From the authors' perspective, the draft is ready for requesting publication. /Miguel -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:42:02 +0200 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: simple-chairs@tools.ietf.org , draft-ietf-simple-chat@tools.ietf.org , rjsparks@nostrum.com A new version (-16) has been submitted for draft-ietf-simple-chat: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-simple-chat/ Diff from previous version: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-simple-chat-16 IETF Secretariat. From saul@ag-projects.com Thu Aug 16 03:41:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1A121F85E6 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:41:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.316 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.372, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56J4Bafep87Y for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node06.dns-hosting.info [85.17.186.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F339221F8525 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 894F8B014F; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imac.saghul.lan (ip3e830637.speed.planet.nl [62.131.6.55]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 103D4B0063; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sa=FAl_Ibarra_Corretg=E9?= In-Reply-To: <502CACC8.40901@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:41:05 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20120816074202.3585.56492.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <502CACC8.40901@ericsson.com> To: Miguel A. Garcia X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Simple WG Subject: Re: [Simple] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-simple-chat-16.txt X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:41:16 -0000 On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > We have just submitted a new version of the SIMPLE chat draft. >=20 > This version fixes an aligns the example of a notification from the = conference event package (Section 9.6) with the published RFCs 6501 and = 6502. In particular, 'nickname' is an attribute of . In older = versions of these documents, nickname used to be an child element of = . >=20 > Besides, we have fixed a few nits revealed by idnits. >=20 > =46rom the authors' perspective, the draft is ready for requesting = publication. >=20 +1. -- Sa=FAl Ibarra Corretg=E9 AG Projects From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Fri Aug 24 16:22:19 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D974421F8622; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPaPmsR5Alg9; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7764321F85C0; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5121BB1E003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:20:17 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20120824232017.5121BB1E003@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Cc: simple@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Simple] RFC 6714 on Connection Establishment for Media Anchoring (CEMA) for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:22:20 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6714 Title: Connection Establishment for Media Anchoring (CEMA) for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) Author: C. Holmberg, S. Blau, E. Burger Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: August 2012 Mailbox: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com, staffan.blau@ericsson.com, eburger@standardstrack.com Pages: 22 Characters: 50543 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-cema-07.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6714.txt This document defines a Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) extension, Connection Establishment for Media Anchoring (CEMA). Support of this extension is OPTIONAL. The extension allows middleboxes to anchor the MSRP connection, without the need for middleboxes to modify the MSRP messages; thus, it also enables secure end-to-end MSRP communication in networks where such middleboxes are deployed. This document also defines a Session Description Protocol (SDP) attribute, 'msrp-cema', that MSRP endpoints use to indicate support of the CEMA extension. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From prasun.bheri@gmail.com Mon Aug 27 01:15:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D93E21F8568 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOO-DSf14-2g for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB63921F84F9 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so8627685iab.31 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:15:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=XywmvifDAdjLnfNLgKCzqfSkTuRvlOAy2bQEMPxLv8E=; b=hXxhu/8AXhUaBS73NWILdkQa2OwmjkQU9n1pjnRmY2JiyAsn6uNI49/mM2jp+5KAir IPyxOPLG/7/EBzVDfPVbXkehEbmYUVVE+FeAV8LKx2Jx0Zd3EnDvFoFhxzDdKTkcgM5p ZCnSM5DWojwj8YL71cnAGzjnwQxGzANWFKsjTqZl1uqA80ygDPKkMsgrFtlF9ycR+PRc hOQje7vVMCPFcW41uWhdySMANg002GLK1VwbdcBbliEdGrYKJoAvbUGXM7j76KkQgBn9 cC8h211Xy3jdh8E963HKeJhQg9Jqy/LQjI/TYZFUh9LueZccE0bajBXMljpltYCcJW8q l0wQ== Received: by 10.50.173.71 with SMTP id bi7mr1682369igc.3.1346055308255; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:15:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.134.234 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:14:28 -0700 (PDT) From: prasun bheri Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:44:28 +0530 Message-ID: To: simple@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6426ea7f229f04c83aec7f Subject: [Simple] Regarding MSRP(rfc 4975) X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:15:09 -0000 --e89a8f6426ea7f229f04c83aec7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Group, I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP) 1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done? Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request? 2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP should respond with 481 transaction response. in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain a session id or not? Thanks & Regards Prasun Bheri --e89a8f6426ea7f229f04c83aec7f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Group,

I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (M= SRP)

1. When a local end point receives a REPORT r= equest that contains a message id which is not known to local end point, wh= at should be done?
Is it ok to=A0respond with 400 Bad request?

2. Whe= n a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP should= respond with 481 transaction response.=A0
in this case, while bu= ilding 481 response should the from-path contain a session id or not?

Thanks & Regards
Prasun Bheri
<= br>


--e89a8f6426ea7f229f04c83aec7f-- From prasun.bheri@gmail.com Mon Aug 27 02:07:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3829C21F8605 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:07:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yuZO6lmkpn4Q for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675B221F8600 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so8725375iab.31 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:07:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Ngo0GOvZFyE+85fAPfkg5Uv9czdnSNZH1wr6gE8u5b8=; b=xzAor0yPO975SJu1lIfPFsGLp+/mRiCX3hxfXZGdANHeM+C0HHKVIa5Qy+B9/t7l/I ey009LPaHuWmjevDhNqnLl4fgtrZXF/rrxqh5fhMx+AXx4CIhKX77ZrHuFXxHT2Ufuh1 3OsHth1vhMuShfaUGwTLmYYTWJoCbgaE9UF+WXQMoYpuvfp9fRXNiIBsCglGz7N2fQO5 bOzcTRQN7JwBT8IBeLc8USOSMhsrb3ut66pzjLgIXMT1ohaTlmrNyobVi3Acr7XRgC70 e/N0J1gI4Wj8xBAz6VwndUDIaTZpd1Pc5TY1NfSjv7BwnHq+h6YCPjEqTC4ARNYdAV85 CCQw== Received: by 10.50.219.161 with SMTP id pp1mr9477118igc.19.1346058448867; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.134.234 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:06:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: prasun bheri Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:36:48 +0530 Message-ID: To: simple@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340457b1121904c83ba7a4 Subject: Re: [Simple] Regarding MSRP(rfc 4975) X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:07:30 -0000 --14dae9340457b1121904c83ba7a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path. Thanks & Regards Prasun On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun bheri wrote: > Hello Group, > > I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP) > > 1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a > message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done? > Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request? > > 2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP > should respond with 481 transaction response. > in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain a > session id or not? > > Thanks & Regards > Prasun Bheri > > > > --14dae9340457b1121904c83ba7a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,
Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for = report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path.

Thanks & Regards
Prasun


On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun= bheri <prasun.bheri@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Group,

I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (M= SRP)

1. When a local end point receives a REPORT r= equest that contains a message id which is not known to local end point, wh= at should be done?
Is it ok to=A0respond with 400 Bad request?

2. Whe= n a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP should= respond with 481 transaction response.=A0
in this case, while bu= ilding 481 response should the from-path contain a session id or not?

Thanks & Regards
Prasun Bheri




--14dae9340457b1121904c83ba7a4-- From ben@nostrum.com Mon Aug 27 06:39:15 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B50F21F860B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.283 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.283 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.284, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id juj2O446CcCd for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B88121F850C for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.30] (cpe-76-187-92-156.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.92.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7RDd5fm060460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:39:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_163434C9-FAC1-425C-83DC-7C645EE0678F" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) From: Ben Campbell In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:39:10 -0500 Message-Id: References: To: prasun bheri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 76.187.92.156 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Cc: simple@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Simple] Regarding MSRP(rfc 4975) X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:39:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_163434C9-FAC1-425C-83DC-7C645EE0678F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In regards to question 2--you also do not respond to a response. Thanks! Ben. On Aug 27, 2012, at 4:06 AM, prasun bheri = wrote: > Hi, > Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for = report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path. >=20 > Thanks & Regards > Prasun >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun bheri = wrote: > Hello Group, >=20 > I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP) >=20 > 1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a = message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done? > Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request? >=20 > 2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id = local EP should respond with 481 transaction response.=20 > in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain = a session id or not? >=20 > Thanks & Regards > Prasun Bheri >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Simple mailing list > Simple@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple --Apple-Mail=_163434C9-FAC1-425C-83DC-7C645EE0678F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
In regards to question 2--you also do not respond to a response.

Thanks!

Ben.

On Aug 27, 2012, at 4:06 AM, prasun bheri <prasun.bheri@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path.

Thanks & Regards
Prasun


On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun bheri <prasun.bheri@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Group,

I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP)

1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done?
Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request?

2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP should respond with 481 transaction response. 
in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain a session id or not?

Thanks & Regards
Prasun Bheri




_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

--Apple-Mail=_163434C9-FAC1-425C-83DC-7C645EE0678F--