From mailnull@www1.ietf.org  Tue Nov 26 08:38:58 2002
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00748
	for <sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:38:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAQDfDW26701
	for sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:41:13 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDfDv26698
	for <sip-security-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:41:13 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00726
	for <sip-security-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:38:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDf7v26690;
	Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:41:07 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDYtv25848
	for <sip-security@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:34:55 -0500
Received: from albatross.wise.edt.ericsson.se (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00489
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:32:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hendrix.lmf.ericsson.se (hendrix.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.11.8])
	by albatross.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.12.1/8.12.1/WIREfire-1.4) with ESMTP id gAQDYpKV004563
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:34:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: from lmf.ericsson.se (EF5DM00K04BAV71.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.30.3])
	by hendrix.lmf.ericsson.se (8.12.6/8.12.6/lmf-2.1-jcs) with ESMTP id gAQDYqu4011942
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:34:52 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <3DE37875.B20A0D34@lmf.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:34:45 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sip-security@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Sip-security] How active is this list?
Sender: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Security Issues for the SIP protocol <sip-security.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Folks,

It seems that the security design team is not active anymore. I was
wondering whether or not we still need this mailing list.

Opinions?

Thanks,

Gonzalo
_______________________________________________
Sip-security mailing list
Sip-security@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security



From mailnull@www1.ietf.org  Tue Nov 26 08:48:55 2002
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01154
	for <sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:48:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAQDp9l27177
	for sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:51:09 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDp9v27173
	for <sip-security-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:51:09 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01146
	for <sip-security-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:48:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDp3v27157;
	Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:51:03 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAQDoOv27130
	for <sip-security@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:50:24 -0500
Received: from zrc2s0jx.nortelnetworks.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01126
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:47:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zrc2c011.us.nortel.com (zrc2c011.us.nortel.com [47.103.120.51])
	by zrc2s0jx.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id gAQDoWq15922;
	Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:50:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: by zrc2c011.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <XN2Z6LPH>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:50:19 -0600
Message-ID: <1B54FA3A2709D51195C800508BF9386A05A7CB05@zrc2c000.us.nortel.com>
From: "Mary Barnes" <mbarnes@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" <Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se>,
        Sip-security@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sip-security] How active is this list?
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:50:14 -0600
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Sender: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Security Issues for the SIP protocol <sip-security.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Gonzalo,

I thought Dean made a suggestion a few months back that this list can go
away (but, I don't see that posting in the archives).  There's only ever
been a minimal of discussion on this list, with most ending up on the main
SIP list. So, I would think it can easily disappear from active duty, but it
might be nice to keep the archives if that would be possible. 

Mary. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:35 AM
To: Sip-security@ietf.org
Subject: [Sip-security] How active is this list?


Folks,

It seems that the security design team is not active anymore. I was
wondering whether or not we still need this mailing list.

Opinions?

Thanks,

Gonzalo
_______________________________________________
Sip-security mailing list
Sip-security@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security
_______________________________________________
Sip-security mailing list
Sip-security@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security



From mailnull@www1.ietf.org  Tue Nov 26 23:30:56 2002
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA04728
	for <sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:30:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAR4XJI19472
	for sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:33:19 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAR4XJv19469
	for <sip-security-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:33:19 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA04722
	for <sip-security-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:30:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAR4XCv19461;
	Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:33:12 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAR4WHv19442
	for <sip-security@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:32:17 -0500
Received: from hotmail.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA04716
	for <sip-security@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:29:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:32:07 -0800
Received: from 216.209.118.21 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Wed, 27 Nov 2002 04:32:06 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [216.209.118.21]
From: "Dmitri Vinokurov" <vde_rlz@hotmail.com>
To: sip-security@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 04:32:06 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F117Pp0yypcxp6NnTgb0000cf39@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2002 04:32:07.0026 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1607520:01C295CD]
Subject: [Sip-security] "forking problem"
Sender: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Security Issues for the SIP protocol <sip-security.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Hello,

The "forking problem" for challenge-response authentication was mentioned in 
many sources. It looks like phone line is splitted inside the residence to 
more that one phones and all of them try to challenge the caller by 
different nonces, but Proxy accepts only the very first 401 response with 
all the ensuing consequences.

Why doesn't Proxy wait X msec after receving first response (if it is 401), 
accept all challenges with the same Call-ID but not more than Y of them 
(say, 8) and compile and send to the caller one composite response as 
forking proxy does.

What is wrong with such approach? And what is the proper generic non-PKI 
solution if any exists? Was is described somewhere?

Thank you.
Dmitri

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_______________________________________________
Sip-security mailing list
Sip-security@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security



From mailnull@www1.ietf.org  Thu Nov 28 18:59:59 2002
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06956
	for <sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:59:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAT02Ld16196
	for sip-security-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 19:02:21 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT02Lv16193
	for <sip-security-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 19:02:21 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06950
	for <sip-security-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:59:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT02Fv16182;
	Thu, 28 Nov 2002 19:02:16 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT012v16161
	for <sip-security@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 19:01:02 -0500
Received: from sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06908
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:58:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mira-sjc5-9.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-9.cisco.com [171.71.163.32])
	by sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gAT00c0J025105
	for <Sip-security@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CJ650 (ssh-sjc-1.cisco.com [171.68.225.134])
	by mira-sjc5-9.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.66-GA)
	with SMTP id DJF00096;
	Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
From: "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: <Sip-security@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Sip-security] How active is this list?
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:02:03 -0800
Message-ID: <MFEJKLHKCMNFOPKPHMBPOELICDAA.fluffy@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <1B54FA3A2709D51195C800508BF9386A05A7CB05@zrc2c000.us.nortel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-security-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Security Issues for the SIP protocol <sip-security.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security>,
	<mailto:sip-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


make this list die :-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-security-admin@ietf.org [mailto:sip-security-admin@ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Mary Barnes
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:50 AM
> To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo'; Sip-security@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Sip-security] How active is this list?
>
>
> Gonzalo,
>
> I thought Dean made a suggestion a few months back that this list can go
> away (but, I don't see that posting in the archives).  There's only ever
> been a minimal of discussion on this list, with most ending up on the main
> SIP list. So, I would think it can easily disappear from active
> duty, but it
> might be nice to keep the archives if that would be possible.
>
> Mary.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@lmf.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:35 AM
> To: Sip-security@ietf.org
> Subject: [Sip-security] How active is this list?
>
>
> Folks,
>
> It seems that the security design team is not active anymore. I was
> wondering whether or not we still need this mailing list.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-security mailing list
> Sip-security@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-security mailing list
> Sip-security@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-security mailing list
Sip-security@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-security



