Subject: RE: [SIP] draft-byerly-sip-radius-00.txt

From: Jonathan Rosenberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:32:34 -0500

Absolutely correct. In fact, the only real difference between the chap based
authentication and digest should be the formatting of the response value.

-Jonathan R.

---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg                       72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[email-masked]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jdrosen         PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Slepchin [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:58 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [SIP] draft-byerly-sip-radius-00.txt
> 
> 
> Minor comment on draft-byerly-sip-radius-00.txt: the draft 
> seems to deviate
> unnecessarily from the challenge and credentials syntax specified in
> RFC2617, i.e., it uses semicolon to separate challenge/credentials
> parameters instead of reusing comma-separation mandated by HTTP
> Basic/Digest. I think consistency with HTTP should be 
> maintained wherever
> possible.
> 
> Thank you,
> Igor Slepchin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/sip
> 

_______________________________________________
SIP mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/sip