Subject: [lamps] RFC6844bis: Minor changes; Last Call?

From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:47 -0700

I've uploaded a new revision of 6844bis. The changes since the last 
version are pretty minor.

- Incorporated Ilari's whitespace fix to the ABNF 
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/current/msg02845.html).
- Made it clear that if the issuevalue doesn't match the ABNF, that 
issue tag doesn't authorize issuance by anyone (and therefore, if it's 
the only issue tag in the resource record set, forbids issuance by 
everyone).

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-01

The diff can be seen at 
https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/commit/65ac0373487733c834c58733963550a9b03fef92.

I think this is ready for Last Call. Russ, what do you think?