Subject: Re: [Speechsc] weight-value clarification

From: Dan Burnett <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 04:42:42 -0700 (PDT)

Tracked as issue 87 in
http://www.softarmor.com/roundup/speechsc.

Current resolution is deferred (to a later
specification than MRCPv2) because it depends on issue
85, which is also deferred.

-- dan

--- Brett Gavagni <[email-masked]> wrote:

> The ABNF in draft-9 incorrectly defines the
> precision of the weight-value 
> in contrast with the W3C SRGS spec w.r.t  weight
> attribute of a <item> 
> element. 
> 
>    weight                =    "Weight" ":"
> weight-value CRLF
> 
>    weight-value          =    1*DIGIT
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/#S2.4.1
> 
> 2.4.1 Weights
> A weight may be optionally provided for any number
> of alternatives in an 
> alternative expansion. Weights are simple positive
> floating point values 
> without exponentials. Legal formats are "n", "n.",
> ".n" and "n.n" where 
> "n" is a sequence of one or many digits.
> 
> Propose to track an issue for the next draft to
> redefine weight-value to a 
> float similarly as defined: RFC 2425 A MIME
> Content-Type for Directory 
> Information
> 
>    float = [sign] 1*DIGIT ["." 1*DIGIT]
> 
>    sign = "+" / "-"
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brett Gavagni 
> WebSphere Voice Server Development 
>
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/pervasive/voice_server/
> (561) 862-2097 T/L (975) 
> [email-masked]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speechsc mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc