From nobody Tue May 27 09:24:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FFB1A019C for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:24:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.553 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ORNmaqekX_eV for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A841A016D for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B72C18000F; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:23:50 -0700 (PDT) To: scott@kitterman.com, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/Mac0jzMIynBPWiI3L7ERtRrYV94 Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, me@jimmyxu.org Subject: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:24:25 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4001 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jimmy Xu Section: A.4 Original Text ------------- example.com. SPF ( "v=spf1 " "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " "+all" ) ip4._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" ptr._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ptr +all" Corrected Text -------------- example.com. TXT ( "v=spf1 " "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " "+all" ) ip4._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" ptr._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ptr +all" Notes ----- According to Section 14.1 and Appendix B, the use of DNS RR type SPF (99) has been removed from the protocol. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : S. Kitterman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SPF Update Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue May 27 11:31:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606D81A0650 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:31:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.137 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7AV-zlK2iUB9 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFD11A01F6 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 80278 invoked from network); 27 May 2014 18:31:42 -0000 Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 27 May 2014 18:31:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=293e.5384da0e.k1405; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=YAK4O450gBCCc2blOpdvxmOYZGfIVCpLskHdZAro418=; b=V1O85zXuRKef2Iq93LiaiyLzl9Dk1v0+ubKMkdEx3H+ktPXUvLV7nNjYrSUqSm7AcYka9dRnd0em6i8Ef4zSh27nfm2PirQhBSOhcQ//hjQUXNWB7W3y6rWm9VolmwQGyeOMeMDWM2Gw/mSoZ7OYu6B47UiXgLXnT0KdhDfrY2S9/Dhbv9VK6C9KDZTPr/a0R3xeAWWC3SfG/QMmMMOMz57DSb/vpmy+1SP3YoA/J9wVcYgSae/ruQNYG+O+7WA0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=293e.5384da0e.k1405; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=YAK4O450gBCCc2blOpdvxmOYZGfIVCpLskHdZAro418=; b=PGsKMwZ9fxNGACcBukODJQ9JLJh+j6vNa5J4twsI1XdvHIEqZboRgRpNY4AxMSO7oaIq0UP+nDLe0Cbv8HCm2qLIEtdG8VN3qtKRZXSICbgAzoKPxxHyPlknjEy5G4qjXODp4M6LOHxxu8ehwFVFV4unujcjb+oSso9xbK0XrYubfqP+wmO1kDu6HaRSytjBGOcDXRDBrR4+Gc2+FC/wIdFHCmbDxQF63tbRiDERg/yvjuAKW1Rx1ZV8banddfyQ Date: 27 May 2014 18:31:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: spfbis@ietf.org In-Reply-To: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/d8yo3W8KcIwNEpKNU4UFbmtRhKo Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:31:50 -0000 >Original Text >------------- > example.com. SPF ( "v=spf1 " > "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " > "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " > "+all" ) > ip4._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" > ptr._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ptr +all" > >Corrected Text >-------------- > example.com. TXT ( "v=spf1 " > "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " > "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " > "+all" ) > ip4._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" > ptr._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ptr +all" Oops. How'd we miss that? R's, John From nobody Tue May 27 11:36:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889631A0680 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.758 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Aw46wGtZm2q for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F47A1A067A for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-08-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5BDF8A036 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 18:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:36:01 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: spfbis@ietf.org Message-ID: <20140527183601.GG12354@mx1.yitter.info> References: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/1Kw7u1xVvLxppnZ-uzs_CedtKOc Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:36:12 -0000 On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:31:20PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > Oops. How'd we miss that? > Indeed. In fact, I could swear I recall an email exchange about it, but I haven't managed to dig it out. Maybe I dreamed it. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From nobody Sat May 31 13:54:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506201A00B2 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 13:54:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.552 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrShH8P6--6U for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaja.besserwisser.org (jaja.besserwisser.org [192.36.115.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1DF1A00B0 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jaja.besserwisser.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 1E5A39E96; Sat, 31 May 2014 22:54:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 22:54:42 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson To: John Levine Message-ID: <20140531205441.GB9516@besserwisser.org> References: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> X-URL: http://vvv.besserwisser.org X-Purpose: More of everything NOW! X-happyness: Life is good. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/fbcdj19lwnx-k-uxFkSO9LC2WRs Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:54:51 -0000 --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) Date: Tue,= May 27, 2014 at 06:31:20PM -0000 Quoting John Levine (johnl@taugh.com): > >Original Text > >------------- > > example.com. SPF ( "v=3Dspf1 " > > "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " > > "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " > > "+all" ) > > ip4._spf.example.com. SPF "v=3Dspf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" > > ptr._spf.example.com. SPF "v=3Dspf1 -ptr +all" > > > >Corrected Text > >-------------- > > example.com. TXT ( "v=3Dspf1 " > > "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " > > "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " > > "+all" ) > > ip4._spf.example.com. TXT "v=3Dspf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" > > ptr._spf.example.com. TXT "v=3Dspf1 -ptr +all" >=20 > Oops. How'd we miss that? Unconciously, you did the right thing. Admit it.=20 --=20 M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 RHAPSODY in Glue! --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOKQZEACgkQ02/pMZDM1cVtvQCfZpapm4qbOV9g/6Pgnp3ig68o nzUAnih4MJvhC7iXGhgThmB4NbwZ6pAA =wfE1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--