From nobody Wed Jun 4 10:13:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A385A1A035C for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:13:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.952 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYz6OWzBtEM3 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E7441A0259 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1401901978; x=1433437978; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=chaigWeTHi2zmQjxDIw9fnv0xwaR8Y17g7RrUI2Mcrk=; b=bNFPKPe8jHMuIQYN9n/o44KWDgNMhvPUMPMBsWG7dry5LwAddC9aoiCO Dd/Cd9ARA3/8CCiMrSyAgZ6Bl1UExEB0ojdBuQP2kbGi1zn0e8Rf0GFaV va9Oxzziqamw5zlhDA1r79kKid08TKwqv52imFuvkGOT8VCL/JKomgsMC E=; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7459"; a="39690056" Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2014 10:12:58 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,974,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="743813942" Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Jun 2014 10:12:58 -0700 Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:12:57 -0700 Message-ID: <538F5398.7050009@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:12:56 -0500 From: Pete Resnick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Sullivan References: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> <20140527183601.GG12354@mx1.yitter.info> In-Reply-To: <20140527183601.GG12354@mx1.yitter.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/MrE1AM1QKehPi6nsmexl_H9q6yc Cc: spfbis@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:13:05 -0000 On 5/27/14 1:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:31:20PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > >> Oops. How'd we miss that? >> >> > Indeed. In fact, I could swear I recall an email exchange about it, > but I haven't managed to dig it out. Maybe I dreamed it. > I'll go mark it as Verified, but I'll change it to Editorial, as an example should have no Technical impact. pr -- Pete Resnick Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 From nobody Wed Jun 4 10:32:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FB81A0232 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFUGkxHU3zA6 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28781A0141 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566F0D04187; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:32:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2014-01; t=1401903149; bh=ETnSjlcbuHq14KdjzzBIzMhFf97WELhg0O9EL5qRcYU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=01/hoojPZ1NFZDlTAhQUj0D5KbVxznK8TQy0wBmUyGCQeXXm0cZZHjPHvlUXuaERt 1PSun4jyru1DObT86P+bgSIRE37yWUxgP0Y3jnxV6kNFa7+X0FbHo34885uiexixXk 4UB3B8VcXTlu7dpbsoO6rKAovq7VbtrNUsv3Tzgs= Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (173-14-17-165-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.14.17.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1029FD04091; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:32:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Scott Kitterman To: spfbis@ietf.org Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:32:27 -0400 Message-ID: <3076874.EPplHk2Oyy@scott-latitude-e6320> User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.13.0-27-generic; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <538F5398.7050009@qti.qualcomm.com> References: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> <20140527183601.GG12354@mx1.yitter.info> <538F5398.7050009@qti.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/L0q4ZI6fivMtTrWobF3DJ9pl76k Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:32:37 -0000 On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:12:56 Pete Resnick wrote: > On 5/27/14 1:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:31:20PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > >> Oops. How'd we miss that? > > > > Indeed. In fact, I could swear I recall an email exchange about it, > > but I haven't managed to dig it out. Maybe I dreamed it. > > I'll go mark it as Verified, but I'll change it to Editorial, as an > example should have no Technical impact. Thanks, Scott K From nobody Wed Jun 4 12:04:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793441A033B for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:04:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.652 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7o4SvH340Zu for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED271A0327 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:04:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1401908659; x=1433444659; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zqi8TaagKwd6nWCWU7tAUKKZnEYe6sOI9Rrn7csDk8o=; b=jcHS36EzFi2S/ulJX7CPQGHFlaazFO6bwAumEjXQj5NJjsIMm9JfTOJ4 naisCBmTjft5wXbTw+k7AFYcNTAtShCuItMGhxFchQNASYQGu7wnObSiU qHqSCZK/tba/ivF+UoHOGFm8QAYPJW4/DlWSZe6AuQV1ZokNrbch2/we7 g=; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7459"; a="64943751" Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2014 12:04:19 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,974,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="743864920" Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Jun 2014 12:04:18 -0700 Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) by nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:04:18 -0700 Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:04:11 -0700 Message-ID: <538F6DA6.7090902@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:04:06 -0500 From: Pete Resnick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Sullivan References: <20140527162350.7B72C18000F@rfc-editor.org> <20140527183120.10557.qmail@joyce.lan> <20140527183601.GG12354@mx1.yitter.info> <538F5398.7050009@qti.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <538F5398.7050009@qti.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/0f-6zKmU3-4zPxZt71NajVwr9k8 Cc: spfbis@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:04:26 -0000 On 6/4/14 12:12 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > On 5/27/14 1:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:31:20PM -0000, John Levine wrote: >>> Oops. How'd we miss that? >>> >> Indeed. In fact, I could swear I recall an email exchange about it, >> but I haven't managed to dig it out. Maybe I dreamed it. > > I'll go mark it as Verified, but I'll change it to Editorial, as an > example should have no Technical impact. Actually, strike that. I'll mark it as "Hold for Document Update". No interoperability problem is implied by it at the moment. pr -- Pete Resnick Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 From nobody Wed Jun 4 12:08:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C3D1A02DA; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:08:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.553 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DbY44ck7Wiy; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB791A033B; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 26C67180016; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT) To: me@jimmyxu.org, scott@kitterman.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20140604190725.26C67180016@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/p71EcKMhbUbW1C4Hm_Qpc_hsHgI Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [spfbis] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7208 (4001) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:08:34 -0000 The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7208, "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4001 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Jimmy Xu Date Reported: 2014-05-27 Held by: Pete Resnick (IESG) Section: A.4 Original Text ------------- example.com. SPF ( "v=spf1 " "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " "+all" ) ip4._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" ptr._spf.example.com. SPF "v=spf1 -ptr +all" Corrected Text -------------- example.com. TXT ( "v=spf1 " "-include:ip4._spf.%{d} " "-include:ptr._spf.%{d} " "+all" ) ip4._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ip4:192.0.2.0/24 +all" ptr._spf.example.com. TXT "v=spf1 -ptr +all" Notes ----- According to Section 14.1 and Appendix B, the use of DNS RR type SPF (99) has been removed from the protocol. -------------------------------------- RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : S. Kitterman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SPF Update Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG