Subject: [Srcomp] Section 3.2.2 of C-SID and VSID

From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 09:25:22 +0000

If I understand correctly, what I should do is to confirm that it is correct of section 3.2.2 of  C-SID/VSID and the notes. Then yes, it is correct.

State it clearly again if needed.

C-SID: In C-SID solutions, no matter next-csid (uSID) or replace-csid (G-SRv6), compressed SIDs and non-compressed SIDs can be encoded in a SRH.

VSID: VSID cannot support to encoded SIDs with different length in a SRH. However, combination of compressed and non-compressed segments in VSID can be supported by using a compressed BSID to impose an additional SRv6 header with non-compressed SIDs.

Cheng

From: Srcomp [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 11:07 PM
To: 'srcomp' <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Srcomp] Draft meeting minutes: 5/6/2021

Attendees:

Weiqiang, Darren, Ron, Wim, Cheng

RESOLVED
--------------

-          The group will meet twice weekly, at 1300 UTC on Wednesdays and Fridays
-          The Wednesday meeting will be dedicated to consensus calls for each section of the analysis document
-          The Friday meeting will be dedicated to preparing sections that have been  analyzed on the mailing list for a consensus call
-          All participants will contribute to analysis on the mailing list
-          The following sections have passed consensus call
o   3.2.3
o   3.2.4
o   4.1
o   5.1
o   5.2

ACTION ITEMS
============
-          Section 3.2.2
o   Cheng Li to send email regarding the note and VSID
o   PSF to send email regarding the node and UIDSR
o   Weiqiang to send email regarding the conclusion statement
-          3.3.1
o   All: Formulate text on note
-          3.4.1
o   Add 2-3 sentences on how we got to "yes" (Darren: CSID, Cheng:VSID, PSF: UIDSR, Ron:CRH

Juniper Business Use Only