From nobody Tue Jan 5 00:58:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AEF1A00E6 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:58:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.571 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bh-8znCGG9Xc for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64351A00E5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:58:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from CNNIC-PC (unknown [218.241.103.77]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0A5QDi6hYtWag4pCQ--.33700S2; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:58:34 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:58:18 +0800 From: "qinxiaowei@cnnic.cn" To: storagesync , fsong X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 5, 136[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2016010516581844207610@cnnic.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart375710108100_=----" X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0A5QDi6hYtWag4pCQ--.33700S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUOI7k0a2IF6FyUM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26ryj 6F1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r xl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv 0487Mc02F40Ex7xS67I2xxkvbII20VAFz48EcVAYj21l5I8CrVC20s02628v4x8GjsIEw4 AK0wAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCj c4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F24lFcxC0VAYjx AxZF0Ex2IqxwCY02Avz4vE14v_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1V AY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAI cVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJw CI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMVCEFcxC 0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0YhF3UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: xtlq5x5drzvxw6fq0xffof0/ Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Storagesync] recent issues discussed (plain text) X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:58:42 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart375710108100_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksRmVpPklmIEkgZGlkIG5vdCBnZXQgd3JvbmcsIHRoaXMgaXNzdWUgaXMgY29tcGxpY2F0ZWQg YW5kIHNob3VsZCBiZSBzZXBlcmF0ZWQgaW50byBtdWx0aXBsZSBzdGVwcy4gPmxpa2UgcHJvdG9j b2wgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnQsIGRlcGxveW1lbnQgb3B0aW1pemF0aW9uLCBldGMuSSBkZWVwbHkgYWdy ZWUgd2l0aCB5b3UuIFRoYXQgaXMgYSBncmVhdCBwcm9ibGVtLCBidXQsIElNTywgaXMgd29ydGgg ZG9pbmcuICBJZiBuZWVkZWQsIEkgd2lsbCBvdXRsaW5lIHdoYXQgc2hvdWxkIHdlIGRvIGFib3V0 IHRoYXQuQmVzdCB3aXNoZXMhWGlhbyB3ZWkgUWluDQoNCiAKDQoNCg0KDQo= ------=_001_NextPart375710108100_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
Hi,Fei=

>If I did not get wrong, this issue is co=
mplicated and should be seperated into multiple steps. 
>like protocol improvement, deployment optimization, et=
c.
I deeply agree with you. That is a great problem, but, IMO, is worth d=
oing.  If needed, I will outline what should we do about that.
Best wish=
es!
Xiao wei Qin


 =0A
=0A
=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart375710108100_=------ From nobody Wed Jan 6 21:35:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DB81A6FC5 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 21:35:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.39 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMjJ3Gj8XTbM for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 21:35:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2AE1A6FAD for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 21:35:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from CNNIC-PC (unknown [218.241.103.116]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0B5gDgn+Y1WKaApCQ--.34081S2; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:35:35 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:35:20 +0800 From: "qinxiaowei@cnnic.cn" To: fsong , storagesync References: <2016010516581844207610@cnnic.cn>, <2016010517035181241711@bjtu.edu.cn> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 5, 136[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201601071335198488025@cnnic.cn> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart085001160157_=----" X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0B5gDgn+Y1WKaApCQ--.34081S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWrKF18ZFWrXr4rXw1xZr43ZFb_yoW8Jr15pF WDKF1293WDXr4fXrnrZa4kWF1FqF95Gay3XryUKryrZwn8CFn2gr4Iqw18X34xur95Cr40 vFWagw47u3W2vrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUmCb7Iv0xC_Zr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVAqjxCE 14ACF2xKxwAqx4xG6xAIxVCFxsxG0wAqx4xG6I80eVA0xI0YY7vIx2IE14AGzxvEb7x7Mc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wACY4xI67k04243AV C20s07MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8WwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8 JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1V AFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIxAIcV C2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCE64xvF2IEb7IF 0Fy7YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jO3kNUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xtlq5x5drzvxw6fq0xffof0/ Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Storagesync] recent issues discussed (plain text) X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:35:41 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart085001160157_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksRmVpDQpJTU8sIHRoZSBtYWluIHdvcmsgaW5jbHVkZXM6DQoxLiBJZGVudGlmaWNhdGlvbiBv ZiBwcmUtdXBsb2FkZWQgY29udGVudCBhbmQgUmVkaXJlY3Rpb24gb2YgdGhlIHVwbG9hZGluZyBy ZXF1ZXN0OiANCiAgICAgQXMgd2Uga25vd24sIGluIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nLCBVUkwvVVJJICAtLT4g ICJETkFNRaGxIG9mIHRoZSBETlMgIC0tPiAgdUNETg0KVXBsb2FkaW5nOiBIb3cgdG8gaWRlbnRp ZnkgdGhlIHByZS11cGxvYWRlZCBjb250ZW50IGFuZCByZWRpcmVjdCB0aGUgcmVxdWVzdCB0byBV QVROPw0KMi4gTW92ZSB0aGUgcmFuZG9tICYgbWFzcyBjb250ZW50IGdlbmVyYXRlZCBieSBlbmQg dXNlcnMgZWZmaWNpZW50bHkNCkRvd25sb2FkaW5nOiBjb250ZW50IGdlbmVyYXRlZCBieSBjb21w YW5pZXMsIGxhcmdlIGFuZCBtYW5hZ2VhYmlsaXR5DQpVcGxvYWRpbmc6ICBXaGVuIGFuZCB3aGVy ZSBlbmQgdXNlcnMgdXBsb2FkIGNvbnRlbnQgaXMgcmFuZG9tLCBtYXNzIGFuZCByZWxhdGl2ZWx5 IHNtYWxsDQozLiBCZXN0IGVkZ2Ugc2VydmVyIGFuZCBvcHRpbWFsIHVwbG9hZGluZyByb3V0ZSAN CkRvd25sb2FkaW5nOiBtb3ZpbmcgY29udGVudCB0byB0aGUgaG90IGVkZ2Ugc2VydmVyIGluIGFk dmFuY2UuDQpVcGxvYWRpbmc6IFVBVE4gc2hvdWxkIGFzc2lnbiB0aGUgYmVzdCBlZGdlIHNlcnZl ciBhbmQgc2VsZWN0IGEgb3B0aW1hbCB1cGxvYWRpbmcgcm91dGUgdG8gc2VydmUgYSB1cGxvYWRp bmcuIA0KDQpSZWdhcmRzDQoNClhpYW93ZWkgUWluDQogDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KRmVpIFNv bmcNCj5IaSxGZWk+SWYgSSBkaWQgbm90IGdldCB3cm9uZywgdGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBpcyBjb21wbGlj YXRlZCBhbmQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHNlcGVyYXRlZCBpbnRvIG11bHRpcGxlIHN0ZXBzLiA+bGlrZSBw cm90b2NvbCBpbXByb3ZlbWVudCwgZGVwbG95bWVudCBvcHRpbWl6YXRpb24sIGV0Yy5JIGRlZXBs eSBhZ3JlZSB3aXRoIHlvdS4gVGhhdCBpcyBhIGdyZWF0IHByb2JsZW0sIGJ1dCwgSU1PLCBpcyB3 b3J0aCBkb2luZy4gIElmIG5lZWRlZCwgSSB3aWxsIG91dGxpbmUgd2hhdCBzaG91bGQgd2UgZG8g YWJvdXQgdGhhdC5CZXN0IHdpc2hlcyFYaWFvIHdlaSBRaW4NCiANClRoYXQgd291bGQgYmUgZ3Jl YXQhIFBsZWFzZSBkbyB0aGF0LiB0aGVuIHdlIGNhbiBkaXNjdXNzIGluIGRlcHRoIHZpYSBtYWls aW5nIGxpc3QuDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoYXQhDQogDQo+DQo+IA0KPg0KPg0KPg0KPg0K ------=_001_NextPart085001160157_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
=0A

Hi,Fei

IMO, the main work includes:

1. Identific= ation of pre-uploaded content=0Aand Redirection of the uploading request:&= nbsp;

     As we known, in downloading, URL/URI  -->  "= DNAME=A1=B1 of the D= NS  -->  uCDN

=0A

Uploading:=0AHow to identify the pre-uploaded content and redir= ect the request to UATN?

=0A

2. Move t= he random & mass=0Acontent generated by end users efficiently

=0ADownloading:=0Acontent ge= nerated by companies, large and manageability

=0A

Uploading:  When and where end users upl= oad content is=0Arandom, mass and relatively small

=0A

3. Best edge server and optimal=0Auploading route

=0A=

Downloading:=0Amoving c= ontent to the hot edge server in advance.

=0A

Uploading:=0AUATN should assign the best edge ser= ver and select a optimal uploading route to=0Aserve a uploading.

=0A

= Regards


Xiaowei Qin

=0A
=0A 
=0A
--------------
=0A
Fei Song
=0A
>= ;Hi,Fei>If I did not get wrong, this issue is complicated and should be= seperated into multiple steps. >like protocol improvement, deployment = optimization, etc.I deeply agree with you. That is a great problem, but, I= MO, is worth doing.  If needed, I will outline what should we do abou= t that.Best wishes!Xiao wei Qin
=0A
 
=0A
That woul= d be great! Please do that. then we can discuss in depth via mailing list.=
=0A
Thanks for that!
=0A
 
=0A
>
= =0A
>
=0A
>
=0A
>
=0A
>
= =0A
>
=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart085001160157_=------ From nobody Thu Jan 7 22:33:50 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2451ACE16 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:33:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y81u67CyKXgc for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-pu1apc01on0101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.126.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A541ACE14 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from SIXPR03MB0640.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.174.16) by SIXPR03MB0640.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.174.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:33:24 +0000 Received: from SIXPR03MB0640.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.174.16]) by SIXPR03MB0640.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.174.16]) with mapi id 15.01.0361.006; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:33:24 +0000 From: "Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS" To: storagesync , fsong Thread-Topic: [Storagesync] Camlistore Thread-Index: AQHRQqpNBv5UPaov2Um20LU6f22sxp7xN3Z8 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:33:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <71E522FC-C622-4DDE-B444-5CE902980823@cern.ch> <2015112611280303192311@bjtu.edu.cn> <2015121222163146812636@bjtu.edu.cn>, <41F39F50-E49A-4C2B-BF09-B182580008DF@cern.ch>, <2015121410101651584543@bjtu.edu.cn>, , <201512301031565319224@bjtu.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: <201512301031565319224@bjtu.edu.cn> Accept-Language: en-US, ja-JP Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=david.somers-harris@rakuten.com; x-originating-ip: [133.237.7.83] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SIXPR03MB0640; 5:s5VVr58dOv7K6ZV0dMa3NWuQ10Ri26z2WHN6PltvFu81/b6nr1mjMx8g8ewrSPTKFCCf6lQFPQtuxWRFOp7HuxEhaZcesDo3Cza/Hj/nlm85W1JrK9zoOFPTXlKVvrXLWfwGOm11yRPMbc3g9+Z3Mw==; 24:lFI87FUxpCk2y4EEqu/VERWXtKNh+aQhfs2NQrmbdvoq6VHo1bwTUN1UPbjTaH9uCqnpoh7SKwATv0HiZuzEipDP9ZhqBdSUZj6j1/sOVkc=; 20: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 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SIXPR03MB0640; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e80359e1-7ed0-4e03-e47f-08d317f59c80 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:SIXPR03MB0640; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SIXPR03MB0640; x-forefront-prvs: 0815F8251E x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(51444003)(189002)(50986999)(10400500002)(2900100001)(92566002)(74316001)(1220700001)(5002640100001)(77096005)(106116001)(6116002)(101416001)(2171001)(2950100001)(5001770100001)(586003)(15975445007)(54356999)(87936001)(5008740100001)(3846002)(11100500001)(40100003)(5003600100002)(5001960100002)(105586002)(19580405001)(122556002)(189998001)(5004730100002)(97736004)(66066001)(107886002)(86362001)(76176999)(81156007)(106356001)(93886004)(19580395003)(1096002)(76576001)(33656002)(102836003)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SIXPR03MB0640; H:SIXPR03MB0640.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: rakuten.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: rakuten.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Jan 2016 06:33:24.8397 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 53a8b0d9-d900-48cc-9d7e-5935dc8d5b17 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SIXPR03MB0640 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Storagesync] Camlistore X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:33:48 -0000 Not new ... first commit was about 6 years ago and it's still under active = development ________________________________________ From: Fei Song Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:31 To: Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS; storagesync Subject: Re: [Storagesync] Camlistore Not yet...Is it a new one? -------------- Fei Song >Hi, > >Has anybody here heard of Camlistore? >https://camlistore.org/ > >>From what I gather it's a content agnostic CMS which provides >"... a way to store, sync, share, model and back up content." > > >Quoting the presenter describing his motivations for writing this: >"I'm sick of thinking about what the thing is - I just want a place to put= stuff" >"I don't really like filesystems, I just want a kind of dumping ground" >"I believe in protocols and standards ... not in companies" >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DkBCQq5hfsug > >There was some discussion in this BOF regarding problems which need to be = solved in the content management layer of synchronization. >However, it appears that work has been done already towards solving some = of these problems. >Since it was mentioned in this BOF that we should focus on the transport l= ayer and not so much the application layer, I think that building on top of= work like this could be quite appropriate. > >I checked the thread and there wasn't any mention of Camlistore so hopeful= ly this is helpful information for people here. >If not, I apologize for the distraction :). > >David >_______________________________________________ >Storagesync mailing list >Storagesync@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync