Subject: RE: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign document

From: Miao Fuyou <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:19:47 +0800

One review finding:
 
Section 4.1, TAG of syslog-protocol is a little different to the one of
bsd-syslog. In bsd-syslog(section 4.1.3) it is process name, but in
syslog-protocol (section A.1) it is combination of APP-NAME, PROCID, and
MSGID. So, for bsd-syslog, TAG should be "syslog"("syslog "? typo?), but for
syslog-protocol, APP-NAME should be "syslog".

Thanks!
Miao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harrington [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:22 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign document
> 
>  
> Hi,
> 
> This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last 
> Call for the following document: 
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-18.txt
> 
> The Working Group Last Call for this document will end September 11.
> 
> To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking 
> volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews:
> 	1) Spelling and grammar,
> 	2) boilerplates and reference review, 
> 	3) security review
> 
> The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews 
> before we submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the 
> document and it looks fine, please post a statement that you 
> have reviewed and found the document acceptable. Obviously, 
> if it does not look acceptable please identify your 
> objections, preferably with suggested text that would make it 
> acceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> David Harrington
> [email-masked]
> [email-masked]
> [email-masked]
> co-chair, Syslog WG 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
> 

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog