Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01.txt

From: Michael Welzl <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:00:30 +0100

Hi,

FYI, new ABE draft posted, see below.
This is a minor update to refer to draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02 which is a broader document to allow for ECN experimentation. For the alternative backoff changes required to RFC3168, it takes the role of draft-khademi-tsvwg-ecn-response-00.

Cheers,
Michael

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: <[email-masked]>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01.txt
> Date: October 30, 2016 at 11:56:39 AM GMT+1
> To: Gorry Fairhurst <[email-masked]>, Grenville Armitage <[email-masked]>, Naeem Khademi <[email-masked]>, Godred Fairhurst <[email-masked]>, Michael Welzl <[email-masked]>
> Resent-From: <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn
> Revision:	01
> Title:		TCP Alternative Backoff with ECN (ABE)
> Document date:	2016-10-30
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		10
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-khademi-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo updates the TCP sender-side reaction to a congestion
>   notification received via Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN).
>   The updated method reduces FlightSize in Congestion Avoidance by a
>   smaller amount than the TCP reaction to loss.  The intention is to
>   achieve good throughput when the queue at the bottleneck is smaller
>   than the bandwidth-delay-product of the connection.  This is more
>   likely when an Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanism has used ECN
>   to CE-mark a packet, than when a packet was lost.  Future versions of
>   this document will also describe a corresponding method for SCTP.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>