From nobody Sat Jul 1 03:04:02 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5D013160A for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:04:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MApNJUIVmrXV for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCB9128C82 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u62so74193021pgb.3 for ; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B/v65NkVVVmNvx+Ib7qmTBtKwbKdIWITVKNeTR1mgvc=; b=gOjXDSKmI2iujm0s7R8MBr6WjFR7fL6+LSx8/7mAZURHI593QaQn5GYbJsZfCpzD8m iqoXRq9WyD4dPb2LJthYyaHTQQvdQ9VD5v+LqUFeywyJ3YI46eOJoC2Y9hJRiQjGlt5t dMFcyP3a7AB545nUfODy7mOPmHtxhFiYFOklRDJyzvkuIOuhC2EOqWyffN8ip9OzVqMZ v+IhC3qXHbw890WdWi4vnx83lohCa9vDYrmDy/oHpGvUL9Y/t1JDvQgm9dePg4Akp/7U Rqj6wW87CJvOPv0+WpHgRXGFANq9lQi6DEQ5pUqVeW+VXtyBoVwfRyot1ImdUri0s0yt cLBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B/v65NkVVVmNvx+Ib7qmTBtKwbKdIWITVKNeTR1mgvc=; b=uRiaF2DSvhZ9Q9LFJIKddSrVKuuhIGI33iIs9CMMtCxCMgm0PTevn4E/QhR1yGn7oJ v/nNlCo4gIGFT1M+dmxEV2ipFBhWbNZUn3hnhwsUJc6QWZfOj/PcZWYPGxkqiNEb00sP K57FZnsmEoB+sIeZpZuD99lWph1QBMffGpTcKJD9trDozOo70HBlG2Q4T/KvNwzvqU9+ Mgck5SCDdMoKSFgGxKTvSm2oKWHDJLX2w5ckbvXWZvY5fgK60L1SU/IgicizQ7h9KO7t UBGj2tDDA91gREKHrJiJ6ngyoyRkOLHTFnXw1MQiJMPKRT5ZnVkPtcxDoRiqcShArNT+ ykFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113DqR7xBN4veJgfN2pg2Y2+OzN3fXkME8v+yZW4uGCUmDijRSV7 yW1uNXv1g0qlCe7hyXO3osX9mqPYoO2g X-Received: by 10.99.166.17 with SMTP id t17mr48388pge.60.1498903438074; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.144.23 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:03:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Kasper Nielsen Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 12:03:57 +0200 Message-ID: To: urn@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a3d3afaa95405533ea671" Archived-At: Subject: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 10:04:00 -0000 --001a114a3d3afaa95405533ea671 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a registration request for the urn =E2=80=9Cmrn=E2=80=9D. The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international technical association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of marine aids to navigation. The detail about the request can be seen at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 Please contact me and let me know in case you need further information to process the request. Best Regards Kasper Nielsen IT Architect Danish Maritime Authority Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 2500 Valby Denmark +45 26737340 --001a114a3d3afaa95405533ea671 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings,

On behalf of the = International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Autho= rities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a registration request for the ur= n =E2=80=9Cmrn=E2=80=9D.

The Internationa= l Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA= ) is a non-profit, international technical association servicing more than = 80 countries in the field of marine aids to navigation.
The detail about the request can be seen at https://tools.ietf.org/html/= draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02

Please contact me an= d let me know in case you need further information to process the request.<= /div>

Best Regards

Kasper Niels= en

IT Architect
Danish Maritime Aut= hority
Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
2500 Valby
Denma= rk
+45 26737340

--001a114a3d3afaa95405533ea671-- From nobody Sat Jul 1 14:51:30 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25545126DC2 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:51:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=J0xeceW/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=CpS++Vqm Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gV7Ma-M2u5HZ for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1421200FC for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E59C208DE; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:51:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:51:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=v+Y5Ru05ZCjed5Dxmp Rv3HCkyFuSjFNQqXxciS4H34k=; b=J0xeceW/YKIMHYDi1a7JdCBM5uJ7Ng9E0G 92i7Npr3ueJRVK2mmkpKX3Bg/KDkRXbVcRyQRT/D/9dIBb//g3yuEXBxJzVhE9ht nLbSmsIteaLKQd5DSll01FCqCrjic9P8aNQlixWkjy+9bNShv7CwPWj7asbmY47Z HJDvg8pJrJapcJ8Vv/wOL6T0kFwXDGS1wJGzR6AcQWw9QSn5fD5tdNrJaF/DTVQ/ +FD7e1nEyFjUoueutKoaLx/CrWgOdGMePmP4OMbAisDqJ9xD099IGbWs18v6q7V8 li9IsDxEfUqTl/bx5HMFBZZ3PRCz//XcM4+2a/FIsgfvmuISMbSg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=v+Y5Ru05ZCjed5DxmpRv3HCkyFuSjFNQqXxciS4H34k=; b=CpS++Vqm w8pDme/stZSwBk8Nd6iP6TrxyygQheGMEZb9UQd8nvnWa+nOOCkjS7o27/mfQQ/p cIRSg7NzJ5wxl5i1lTC8zLGe1Sdldhs6f+s2ZJ84PmQCOQVxjsFz7ZP0GWrMq/X4 Pnv0NYdR4lVPQNs6bgIOn2gB2dJWiKezCxdmc38fiX/t7NCyrMMgsdXG1GXVROnW rvh4ZX2dS1lqHC/rcZaMar18X5EzET1xIyrBa+iesoI0J+QYbQCpMdWNe2fXfwoK kbCnXeRsAU3IL4B1L1wY7fzfdoAiHNunG96JIjF7mahNUJS1sIEDjoqDhyBQApYL B5GqSMVELPboVA== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: z0MGikhRPh5pXo2WX1tJ9eNfb09gazifjpQbFLTAmNaP 1498945886 Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.4.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B5F624774; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:51:25 -0400 (EDT) To: Kasper Nielsen , urn@ietf.org References: From: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 15:51:25 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 21:51:29 -0000 Hi Kaspar, Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the careful documentation in Internet-Draft form. RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the registration template has changed (based on many years of experience with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Draft you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and process. Please refer to RFC 8141 for details: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141 Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the specification so that we can review it again. Best Regards, Peter On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > Greetings, > > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a > registration request for the urn “mrn”. > > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international technical > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of marine aids > to navigation. > > The detail about the request can be seen at > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 > > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further information > to process the request. > > Best Regards > > Kasper Nielsen > > IT Architect > Danish Maritime Authority > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 > 2500 Valby > Denmark > +45 26737340 > From nobody Sat Jul 1 17:15:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietf.org Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7904D126DED; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: urn@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149895451045.17364.1586367099400408002@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:15:10 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [urn] I-D Action: draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08.txt X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 00:15:10 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Uniform Resource Names, Revised of the IETF. Title : Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition Authors : John C Klensin Juha Hakala Filename : draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2017-07-01 Abstract: The original registration procedure for formal Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespaces required IETF Consensus. That requirement discouraged some registrations and increased the risk for problems that could occur as a result. The requirements have now been changed by RFC 8141, which adopts a different model, focusing on encouraging registration and publication of information for all appropriate namespaces. This document clarifies the status of relevant older RFCs and confirms and documents advice to IANA about selected existing registrations. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Jul 1 17:33:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8771129B00 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tsCdLWjIs6v8 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC50129436 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dRSp7-000JqJ-2g for urn@ietf.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 20:33:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 20:33:05 -0400 From: John C Klensin To: urn@ietf.org Message-ID: <1EF92DBA753549749920374D@PSB> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 00:33:16 -0000 Hi. Since Barry announced the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07, the new ISBN and ISSN templates have been submitted, reviewed, and registered by IANA (technically, they updated/ replaced the older ones). See the registry, https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml, for more information. As those who looked at it presumably noticed, draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07 contained a number of placeholders, forward references, and "until the new templates are ready and registered" language. I have now gone through it, removed those comments, and generally adjusted the text to reflect the current, more settled, situation. In the process, I discovered and fixed a number of sentences that were unnecessary difficult editorially and clarified several statements about specific actions that affect updating or obsolescence of exiting or earlier documents. draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 has been posted to reflect those changes, none of which change the document substantively. Happy July. john From nobody Sun Jul 2 07:35:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5B312EC1E for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 07:35:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=KdxHgCk4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=a3LfcE1+ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZZma7M435mi for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA061296C9 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA3720B25; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 10:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Jul 2017 10:35:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=629ZFgv+Uiz7C5JItt YVse1HrU0cZ6KHl41HPZdwfEQ=; b=KdxHgCk4J2mw7vZ+unLx6qY+Kk4dbew78D Q7lJVCe4kHzyBXxdD1INNyf5jTNA9ql34TpnoG/Y+pUMcQJ7Q46C+CUr8bugKguy CfVyz2gjMZM7cd59NeoDJbBlP2MdOOSUVxchx1ZRkpk2IqYlbZGHSi6+nE7r9xR4 85QCR01dEdq2H8vMNj+a6sficiSHUfNQpZoWkLz6HfH7eSY3/yklvgrSBtBoCHaA qxKCoMLii7FR2cyhHSoSvIeaIxsg6AJuYQQr2WUSuL1VCNJsq72agJ+mfHBzEX/b VN7heAXgBLKOMo1e11jLL3s632k+yBciEIDuvAbsHFwLpA+Y7NLQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=629ZFgv+Uiz7C5JIttYVse1HrU0cZ6KHl41HPZdwfEQ=; b=a3LfcE1+ vr7F9IEKRqjlYkA19F93Jp8D+VlR2s58Ofg9QLzkVFs0PrPIHzbP9/tqCw3nbQGJ EmaGhpXBo54HTtVzKlW5MLigLGFIqOpB+I/f2eMrq3j8Vl6lZQqCM49Sy+wbIm+u 2VBNxwumFJhho/g7PRExNEgq+1+hewywUcXjJM6q2dv/8fd4L7FenteA/GfA/9lY mVJoq06iJMrR6/SgOyCe9I8FvBqxN9s9NEz9+EjY6v7w6WENjlPk4nSOX61kFyzC XAj4E3pcZy6Lu+AZJrEyXn+zKJHzTkKiOOJF+UGoQ9+2QNhFWw5wKx/7hlWsM9gN Ute5caLbSKwSEw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: PR0zVsz1zvqw5UaSTkWPaWsBQz2BPUH4aKQk6Ncn/6vc 1499006151 Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.4.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AB832246E7; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 10:35:51 -0400 (EDT) To: John C Klensin , urn@ietf.org References: <1EF92DBA753549749920374D@PSB> From: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: <6d55e900-0a0d-bef4-ccfd-fb66e6a71c07@stpeter.im> Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 08:35:51 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1EF92DBA753549749920374D@PSB> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 14:35:55 -0000 Thanks, John. The updates look good and this document appears ready. On 7/1/17 6:33 PM, John C Klensin wrote: > Hi. > > Since Barry announced the WG Last Call on > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07, the new ISBN and ISSN > templates have been submitted, reviewed, and registered by IANA > (technically, they updated/ replaced the older ones). See the > registry, > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml, > for more information. > > As those who looked at it presumably noticed, > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07 contained a number of > placeholders, forward references, and "until the new templates > are ready and registered" language. I have now gone through it, > removed those comments, and generally adjusted the text to > reflect the current, more settled, situation. In the process, > I discovered and fixed a number of sentences that were > unnecessary difficult editorially and clarified several > statements about specific actions that affect updating or > obsolescence of exiting or earlier documents. > > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 has been posted to > reflect those changes, none of which change the document > substantively. > > Happy July. > john > > From nobody Mon Jul 3 15:09:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietf.org Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EC113154D; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:09:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk CC: Barry Leiba , barryleiba@computer.org, draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition@ietf.org, urnbis-chairs@ietf.org, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, urn@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <149911978613.16196.11793633266901517191.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:09:46 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [urn] Last Call: (Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 22:09:46 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Uniform Resource Names, Revised WG (urnbis) to consider the following document: - 'Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-07-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The original registration procedure for formal Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespaces required IETF Consensus. That requirement discouraged some registrations and increased the risk for problems that could occur as a result. The requirements have now been changed by RFC 8141, which adopts a different model, focusing on encouraging registration and publication of information for all appropriate namespaces. This document clarifies the status of relevant older RFCs and confirms and documents advice to IANA about selected existing registrations. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Tue Jul 4 03:23:29 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B9B131DBB for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:23:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roCBMkVGk-E1 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.dnb.de (prodfix-out0.dnb.de [193.175.100.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB6B131559 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smg1.ad.ddb.de (unknown [10.69.63.232]) by mail.dnb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381EA41E81C5; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:23:23 +0200 (CEST) X-AuditID: 0a453fe7-24dff70000000e76-95-595b6c9a78f0 Received: from dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE (dnbf-ex1.ad.ddb.de [10.69.63.245]) by smg1.ad.ddb.de (DNB Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 3F.33.03702.A9C6B595; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:23:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DNBF-EX1.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::7076:30f7:60ad:16a0]) by dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::7076:30f7:60ad:16a0%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:23:22 +0200 From: "Svensson, Lars" To: "John C Klensin (john-ietf@jck.com)" CC: "urn@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 Thread-Index: AdL0r43KwyRR5XzZTgWbLqZ3OXvWkA== Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:23:22 +0000 Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2E4FC3@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.69.12.168] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrKLsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5Wr/VXdWTnSkwbV9Vhatl/6wWUxt/sDk wOSxZMlPJo/LK18zBzBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGUsPDOVqaCLt2LluiuMDYwnuLoYOTkkBEwk ulcfZupi5OIQEjjCKPFvyixmCGcbo8SzvZOAMuwcbAJaEu8zQOpFBGwkZh3axgJiMwsoSmy6 P4UJxBYWsJVoObKFDaLGTuLPpg+MELaeRPuzd2A2i4CKxP+368BqeAW8JTbOmcUKYjMKyEps 2HCeGWKmuMSmZ99ZIW4TkFiyByIuISAq8fLxP6i4gsTTBe+g6g0k3p+bD2VrSyxb+JoZYr6g xMmZT1gmMArPQjJ2FpKWWUhaZiFpWcDIsoqRrzg33VAvMUUvJSVJLyV1EyMkzJ/vYOy75HKI UYCDUYmHN8Q5KlKINbGsuDL3EKM/B5OSKG+sWXSkEF9SfkplRmJxRnxRaU5qsZII79tsoDAv XDipNCdbSY43Uw8oKg4XLS4tLshMzswvLY4vLco5xCjBwQzUOi8ZpDUlsbIqtSgfYuAhRmkO FiVx3pf7GCKEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgshEcHEoSvEogOwWLUtNTK9Iyc0pg0kB9f7OAMgLIMmAH KfK23oqMFJJClkB3ExMH5yFGHw4eoMMK40AOKy5IzC3OTIeaLczLmQkU5YGJgs2V5S0AeVQM Johq5inGeI4Nq9d/YRJiycvPS5US5z0Mdh5IdUZpHtzdUmK8sc89I4X4kSRAxksp8JaCxCWR xFFteMXoCYwuYV4zUIDwAHMRwr1CvDwg93JDBcHOleEtBDlXFCqGbpYPMJ5FeBt6IkCeL0ks Qfb8GpAoD0wU6vk9IEExmCCqcVINjFPWP5NxWaoW4qLtleT4veD5OR2F+ti785c+Dqq8qGeV u78x4MOp+J2hW9Q5nrQrvXwmaR2tqsC23+1uXHtE79wkIYuFDCyZzUq/p/TFr+j23LF6cefL 579v/K8W2JpxgLMuusluue7fEt6wHE6Fvd9698m1zD0c2lY0/VR6o0Rq0FHG3ZU7lViKMxIN tZiLihMBqJW8jWgEAAA= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:23:28 -0000 John, On Sunday, July 02, 2017 4:36 PM, urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] On Beha= lf Of Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Thanks, John. The updates look good and this document appears ready. Yes, I fully agree with Peter. Thanks for moving this forward. Best, Lars >=20 > On 7/1/17 6:33 PM, John C Klensin wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Since Barry announced the WG Last Call on > > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07, the new ISBN and ISSN > > templates have been submitted, reviewed, and registered by IANA > > (technically, they updated/ replaced the older ones). See the > > registry, > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml, > > for more information. > > > > As those who looked at it presumably noticed, > > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07 contained a number of > > placeholders, forward references, and "until the new templates > > are ready and registered" language. I have now gone through it, > > removed those comments, and generally adjusted the text to > > reflect the current, more settled, situation. In the process, > > I discovered and fixed a number of sentences that were > > unnecessary difficult editorially and clarified several > > statements about specific actions that affect updating or > > obsolescence of exiting or earlier documents. > > > > draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 has been posted to > > reflect those changes, none of which change the document > > substantively. > > > > Happy July. > > john > > > > >=20 > _______________________________________________ > urn mailing list > urn@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn From nobody Thu Jul 6 06:44:16 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44F313177C for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=LtWxBxqH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XY/ES8wy Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xl1AGU2eunWg for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 06:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06323131777 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 06:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BB6207F3; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:44:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:44:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=UlJUskv+GiV1LBL9xNQQ/JUixV2CDumsVOimQdDkK 54=; b=LtWxBxqH8TCwQah4ptmnC30CeU9Wiaw5Ujgq1lf+ZmwuXFULqNzQGEH28 yzOjmr9iK+C7iriBBw5PNffv6ueaoJCtWtHvMJ2vfOx96JD01ba9wDyScWoCKZc3 pBog4BiRNH+uAf+eyJ7si7sWVHNxb12NBxztpInuoPpVQfi5um3Px/KZQvciD14P WbPmN4AghNt16EqXa2dczX/9830a2R0NNsqeG6P5PJT+OMtINYTPkQ3EtwvEs3oN bWGEFDuHUwGw5S+8w3yNSJ1LARf83LAxdDiPzrmzLppdMJ3jtdxwnS9C6x7qw64K 2X3I+PZUfk6ONYeyVodKFe6ldCOSw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=UlJUskv+GiV1LBL9xN QQ/JUixV2CDumsVOimQdDkK54=; b=XY/ES8wy4zQ/GACf90pfLCEGilkJ2UsEIw Wb+jiKFAvhatzdHBcq0BppzQqhH6tlogbKucPVr5ZrZsA89ck/MRU4eyzTcBefK5 /Ou1vRkiXAbtJACUMG6VKxuJcszIAGkl2M/IBMWGVXnIwtN7TVBpqBxapO8EIMCX wIQgsBARwF8RUPYsqMYd3Q+TRg1ZP2Ac5M/5S+3rdllyg0meQvWVQJVYwVGu3pYh nSKFV5aSSbqHkoNfGlL6CFEg+Gb6BaPGcgrqi5tmT5s+Dyw/ryHb4qF8PJ9B7i1L JYNwBn2ndvrKZyJfOrV6c97kgwo/cSf35B6fd6JTR2WeE+zHsAnQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: TiZUvnig6GaAyB9FcCghUjJv7gmN8zJPkEj7L5UgphE9 1499348651 Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.4.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4C7024426; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:44:11 -0400 (EDT) To: "urn@ietf.org" From: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 07:44:10 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: [urn] urn:li:activity namespace? X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:44:15 -0000 Someone sent me a URL for a posting at LinkedIn, and it seems to contain an embedded URN: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6288574073530388480/ I realize we're not the protocol police, but I'm curious if anyone has looked into this before or knows someone in a technical capacity at LinkedIn. Peter From nobody Thu Jul 6 11:41:10 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietf.org Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A611318F1; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joel Halpern To: Cc: urn@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition.all@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149936645745.2270.11265321386883433757@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 11:40:57 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [urn] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:40:57 -0000 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-?? Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2017-07-06 IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-17 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: N/A From nobody Thu Jul 6 11:41:53 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC74B131907; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:41:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AAoCW5e2phmT; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964D9131563; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m68so11141453ith.1; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=vRtuJcePOEWW6kXa0tAecDZaDz70NM6UNGGu90ass78=; b=MitmEtQIq9dib/ji7vAg0YX1eoTyg3TycwlEuPDRGApcMBRK007G251PnrTcs8KeRE iyfUmCDfSMM0JijHsv57c4CSKO8j8Z1vPcLOLTbP9KN3K620DTlE2ykbPJbx2jgMWt62 /G4apzpw/K474XhmAFTtjpKKQgGEEbb8QApN9rIRvtKATFX+Y1bLLJNlx50uOPbvPhLn ZfHi+OSZGdw9YOuIf5LBKDeweH+sdA0CnNTwnSp6yi7bNZ6PFBZ9QfZKP7X1YuhmhrZD O/x7fTvyz2LF5CZaSw3lJwh6/7VsXj58Gw8DIslmAK1L9B/QHbaWBw8I0Cgxb1Zx+t8d +tng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vRtuJcePOEWW6kXa0tAecDZaDz70NM6UNGGu90ass78=; b=C1p62EYBduFHBoVBDClkIQaW5l61bS906XS7uj9WmLMcT5vGE6AB5YgUob4y1+eVK4 cJ1KeEjrO4Q5S5zmxOiQMR5763+ThxA978E+Cuw7GaeJcaUVIe+KMb7LymKSvrtdewUg MtUhG3l5I8Bn4UfX6xh7lgHN6XE9EyT7+QQtx/cPXe3PL77vn+0bQnIUtrjLxTzLctIG FZr9ceIJti2yOu59bkqZ4WChrdAFEx0TovBo1uAgu+zh14O0Q2y9TPa/swMziw5BbOXN s67gifBFj62QsbFiL8XpmLAAsDGzoxeE3cyT7jRx3+eL3HQBsREouOI+H4lU7Mg+b0xn HT3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOy1ixu7UaNOm+2kisyahX/rUJG9ps19cr0PZH2ZKB+H1YhhBQer NKWn5a/yWYQ0JAdl8iFWRu6BszI6/g== X-Received: by 10.107.15.170 with SMTP id 42mr52248128iop.170.1499366500897; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.173.26 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <149936645745.2270.11265321386883433757@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <149936645745.2270.11265321386883433757@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Barry Leiba Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 20:41:40 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mbie3mbdv55GNfyHDQ7wa2F0JgY Message-ID: To: Joel Halpern Cc: General Area Review Team , "urn@ietf.org" , IETF discussion list , draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition.all@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:41:50 -0000 Thanks for the review, Joel! Barry On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Document: draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-?? > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2017-07-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-17 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: N/A > > Nits/editorial comments: N/A > > -- Barry -- Barry Leiba (barryleiba@computer.org) http://internetmessagingtechnology.org/ From nobody Sat Jul 8 01:21:29 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5E129B53 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 01:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkNBodT7GvaM for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 01:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F001B124E15 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e7so27409384pfk.0 for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RUyqxgMpMD+X+lShALhPXi/VBy7aC20R579JYfYOgsI=; b=UZA+XVEmbO3L4xWKWy838szn11VGdbEVNefWmXziGOrUmW8iTjJymxb6hYeB5bWgyY WsCHSpoF7dLB62Jxr8HwNXItq60336dHnesZyrI7ZiMrX985hfsCeJWKuKPe3xUyllAS yK/8Xe/WQWTjxacEyzey7fq5vs9h75h7qwlNf273EShchqL2sJluvlIEs+0dUwOugQQj MwdYEzmugQJ+BiQBH8LbDE0sXrpXKlljS3O/+/ADIEcjrNyQgbCvaZ89MCfRDnoLu8bl TzQy3KfUsVZDMlBd5lJ9VJHngn/BlND0fMTUYjwhLP43lb98BnsoxRcCwi9wD781V77I 6Z+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RUyqxgMpMD+X+lShALhPXi/VBy7aC20R579JYfYOgsI=; b=TNI4l7cz1bK4bg/MDt72rDQYlbs92tCZHej3fOIk3Gzt706jomMIAmtdFoITQPNXtf NFc0nKube7eERhifXTuzVwM/1vmhdTJeDINuQ/Jh+Zql/znRSCULPK+FYcaBqV2CvEFE vP4Q5Rt97xiuhhmUNWrYFyCXsamXsqVxvftet83d0kvbFq0xk5EGmQvE1obJGWTxHgoR PrXdwTI8iyMK/um7qZBySKSD3d+GsXiWEG+q3WkxZnRND/I1ndrmGM5LXVbNpFO2684L mRSautMZK8vqSDXZuveZj6lxnQipnfxzmrbIc+pUN5+WRVfnXXGRPxPV+BDJxhcCeOUy ++Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111W5XyUs9fySLMU+atWzVhD+FXNJ4ESpYOPZ10zLMco9RpFV4yp 6KOXGhnwYZK05OpQZbRVjyZLZtUNdoS3 X-Received: by 10.84.216.71 with SMTP id f7mr7403785plj.266.1499502085388; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.144.23 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 01:21:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> References: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> From: Kasper Nielsen Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 10:21:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Saint-Andre Cc: urn@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c652c23c4c70553ca0990" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 08:21:28 -0000 --f403045c652c23c4c70553ca0990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled the draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have these chapters Introduction Specification Template Namespace ID Registration Information ... Examples Namespace Considerations Community Considerations Security Considerations IANA Considerations But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template. What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything into a specification chapter? Best Kasper On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Hi Kaspar, > > Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the careful > documentation in Internet-Draft form. > > RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the > registration template has changed (based on many years of experience > with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Draft > you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and process. > Please refer to RFC 8141 for details: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141 > > Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the specification > so that we can review it again. > > Best Regards, > > Peter > > On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation > > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a > > registration request for the urn =E2=80=9Cmrn=E2=80=9D. > > > > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and > > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international technical > > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of marine aid= s > > to navigation. > > > > The detail about the request can be seen at > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 > > > > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further information > > to process the request. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Kasper Nielsen > > > > IT Architect > > Danish Maritime Authority > > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 > > 2500 Valby > > Denmark > > +45 26737340 > > > > --f403045c652c23c4c70553ca0990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Peter,

Thank you so much for bringin= g this to my intention. I've modelled the draft after previous URN RFC = submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are there any RFCs following RFC 8141= that I can use as a basis for restructuring my submission? I have been una= ble to find any at https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/ur= n-namespaces.xhtml

I am especially struggling = with the overall layout. I currently have these chapters

Introduction
Specification Template
=C2=A0 Names= pace ID
=C2=A0 Registration Information
=C2=A0 ...
Examples
Namespace Considerations
Community Consi= derations
Security Considerations
IANA Considerations

But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specifi= cation template.
What overall structure should I use? Should I ju= st put everything into a specification chapter?

Be= st
=C2=A0 Kasper=C2=A0
=C2=A0

On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter = Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
Hi Kaspar,

Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the careful
documentation in Internet-Draft form.

RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the
registration template has changed (based on many years of experience
with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Draft
you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and process. Please refer to RFC 8141 for details:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141

Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the specification so that we can review it again.

Best Regards,

Peter

On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigatio= n
> and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a
> registration request for the urn =E2=80=9Cmrn=E2=80=9D.
>
> The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and
> Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international technical=
> association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of marine ai= ds
> to navigation.
>
> The detail about the request can be seen at
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kn= ielsen-mrn-urn-02
>
> Please contact me and let me know in case you need further information=
> to process the request.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Kasper Nielsen
>
> IT Architect
> Danish Maritime Authority
> Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
> 2500 Valby
> Denmark
> +45 26737340
>


--f403045c652c23c4c70553ca0990-- From nobody Sat Jul 8 16:17:48 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263E7126B7F for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 16:17:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=Mu5mqU1M; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=cBIwn9vk Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vkShIZ3Q1En for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 16:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044DE12EC46 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 16:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC47207D9; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:17:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 19:17:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zTRbUlbCuhIbgVx5k4 PdHEQj443DcWwfrnQAXlpBCsE=; b=Mu5mqU1M+BE5t6NGm/FICod/q3fe3GsRnb c0e/C3gqfm9Gf0EHMPrfad0QROCUfS9TsjQ0mRmSAcj7/1dWxPkNODp8J/Ye6JqL koGrdyO4xlLARQViZi44vKPPfogL6wHsLxravwX+AxNpKwMAar3DHM7wuLETw+kG +HhsYpWuU+vJ6a55c5R46nSBvxZm/I/OygpimTmwzRVh6YHBGn2zairH1O3eXSEv NLjR1JdAWZRtPjjgaFYoGXzRoWMeT/Vp8+dxfB0k3wudoD80/QnsSBK/7Bp6bbOs tORbLfEpBqVfSR0YjirbCotgKugQRBGMhb3jqeZTrCTTQ88/bGEw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=zTRbUlbCuhIbgVx5k4PdHEQj443DcWwfrnQAXlpBCsE=; b=cBIwn9vk uqfhO6zYHZ8dwXU93441mqDMsjKvUO20Z/nH6eIj95UFylB82c1CSUU7TDRWkhyX IrbZV2IMXeNKkjQMoWQcV3VSkHl1AcJ2l4HO7lV7fi/h8T2sPl2MJTObhwU9+Gjn HPbU8LrpKnaR4k77d7rdXdRhdLMbsn4PWU+EZ1MVnRZyqa9jNw90b266zs4BXp0Y 7eVEI9YQqQY2xRf1FkfDZ8syyYz+6ol+Q5/2b31FeUlKyUqZzDmgfyr23vo2pLcf 5BtEnXElEpp/LdWQWneoU5hHKVEqlcHDseQJJm5YtWklfEJTyP0DNSDuQ2Lsao6+ dvZzqt6HR47S4g== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 3RcIAelJNZFA+JbxC/I2isyKsRHo8YrxAEylhbyLd6LF 1499555862 Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.4.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7E1377E70C; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:17:42 -0400 (EDT) To: Kasper Nielsen References: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> Cc: urn@ietf.org From: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 17:17:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 23:17:47 -0000 Hi Kaspar, The two most recent registrations (ISBN and ISSN) follow the new template, and they are excellent examples: https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn By the way, you no longer need to submit an Internet-Draft, although that is helpful for purposes of review. Peter On 7/8/17 2:21 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled the > draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are > there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for > restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml > > I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have > these chapters > > Introduction > Specification Template > Namespace ID > Registration Information > ... > Examples > Namespace Considerations > Community Considerations > Security Considerations > IANA Considerations > > But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template. > What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything into a > specification chapter? > > Best > Kasper > > > On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > Hi Kaspar, > > Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the careful > documentation in Internet-Draft form. > > RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the > registration template has changed (based on many years of experience > with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Draft > you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and process. > Please refer to RFC 8141 for details: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141 > > > Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the specification > so that we can review it again. > > Best Regards, > > Peter > > On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to > Navigation > > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a > > registration request for the urn “mrn”. > > > > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and > > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international technical > > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of > marine aids > > to navigation. > > > > The detail about the request can be seen at > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 > > > > > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further information > > to process the request. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Kasper Nielsen > > > > IT Architect > > Danish Maritime Authority > > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 > > 2500 Valby > > Denmark > > +45 26737340 > > > > From nobody Tue Jul 18 03:29:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietf.org Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EB9131DE2; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:29:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Bradley To: Cc: urn@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition.all@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.56.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <150037374265.11421.1599883952756977836@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:29:02 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [urn] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:29:03 -0000 Reviewer: John Bradley Review result: Ready No security issues. From nobody Tue Jul 18 03:33:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E0B12EB5F; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z9n60apZZhLn; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB58D1270B4; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z62so11248265ioi.3; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=C0+6Pltv2cByzuXtnkcVjoEZJQe8LrZ57Cd+l6+ni+o=; b=maCBvmGJmUmK7QPnfVemqz20Uv9oUXameN5OWOelOha3/vOScxJ9Ema/VQSJ2RcMQc gTGSWZSoE+p9qOtHlZxEN29JYJNlTGQDRdco0K/Oyd+cDPlrkxf5leWpaNAxCkQl8jpC ZFCOu9mH1BfyexoIqljb+lhr2bOQ5slKxGD9R9CEj+puiPak7n6Z+D6rmXo7qS0MB2BU DUeitPNp18g2CblglkEufSZs9NbV+LHW5y08J2BphyFIuYPpGA6PJk9oLaVX0Qm8gxuf 5bP8rj6Nd+rgm4Lnb3PXSSc4/TTklkxnln1B6OVC8JMs7rFKdqozvjuOWLuMVvgHUGou 45gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C0+6Pltv2cByzuXtnkcVjoEZJQe8LrZ57Cd+l6+ni+o=; b=L8hXsZG4oY/N5rhSeQtCGjOvUTLjckNG9VSbwR/Zhn7Cwj0oojY66zg5ICYliMXU5f cRd9WWcekzISc8GhqwoVjOni43ib+RskezIaAwnM8tEtEo/reQud1n36aRHyDbb05KSd y+xiFK1Lfq1VwUO8anVfdHyJA5Mob4NQTNuQQBoRCVvSyf5PG/c480t+tR49sY+phFki HF7khbehmByA4TN5fs1g7EDEpIbHfPX9jS3OXkbLpsP6m1UiTALUuj5V1tROn99nPTNI KT0GRf9wRJeqy+PEc/WwcWGmxwieZ3C85QhiZM3Xwkv7/g7kKJ1DR06FA21r46Mt9m3B PZqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112WhRgG8ALfGnNmahSQHU7jw4aqgT0tj+0cAZH83PRimFqBk3p+ POOmct5uulpMKj64PS8B7oiEPV/fSw== X-Received: by 10.107.166.212 with SMTP id p203mr786176ioe.112.1500373990032; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.152.80 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <150037374265.11421.1599883952756977836@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <150037374265.11421.1599883952756977836@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Barry Leiba Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:33:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C8lr584325x9i6rhOP68u2yHKVM Message-ID: To: John Bradley Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" , "urn@ietf.org" , IETF discussion list , draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition.all@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08 X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:33:12 -0000 Thanks, John, for taking the time to review. Barry On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:29 PM, John Bradley wrote: > Reviewer: John Bradley > Review result: Ready > > No security issues. > -- Barry -- Barry Leiba (barryleiba@computer.org) http://internetmessagingtechnology.org/ From nobody Wed Jul 26 14:50:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B3A131D70 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kaY6ddW8IhPD for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA29127601 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b8so12774851pgn.0 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bOhQGenuS+waeoFP1Mn3SwNeu6fV1B8y5yEsMbsxxNE=; b=nyY8rXQlT+kWgpQQ1U8A/UmE7UUvTnkjIJdENpD/8vhRzTufs16vKcZDPM4xcVyC4c RGoJXKgexuxIS2kY2ZtIDAm86jFgW3IgbVT8Wmm1H008+x4jzOxYUjDqFm+QnDW6Ba+8 w2ogkip4A+gF/AQ6gpGn3OoygxUxn/QDWRm809XlQ5aKjyVLAADUZyuEISjjatiE3UrL tzxRlX6c691gaYZLytw9VQwdOF0M2uqCRxLPJAwxda7CkVVrU0G0QSbVNYOSudkuE25X Z0IhwDabdEuEgdqlREG4e8Tmylr5fWDHZ+jWX/BUDUJZrfnSTu33F5ZDfcjI4ema+tqc PHcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bOhQGenuS+waeoFP1Mn3SwNeu6fV1B8y5yEsMbsxxNE=; b=cFVj4EpIZDk/W4DbfqzB/XkOkNBFFoQp1PV8WdNRvInN6gYrq4sxBE/yzi+KZe7PAa xgzEvAJiEQlD0jS9rL57zycmdmTF+K+aYTNmFUg/SpHSZL2OAwgrsDCT/VSlZQMB/3vR 8e/YZQARFO2cqJ4h6YPFdkfO7v+nRruE4VY1WLrShIcbLHxDfO4axyyNbiRF6XzysFtv dCxA5em/qjNWje4L3vxexOek47Vn/g1Twbnhswg8opNovaYz5hhDhqmlPOr4n1RVbz/2 Bp9N+55SuOjHlm7J5ZpQarmaYwM4cZ+TJY8tl+NWCwg6h41ojbB92tunW1jbYatwCFAX iKkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112UWgNt/6vfQBi5+CsA3THRXS+RVtH/IUuambfubZBQE1JTWlFs ZYCqK39kjorfZuwKfOxd5q8wU4wFwg== X-Received: by 10.99.123.81 with SMTP id k17mr2168743pgn.432.1501105822733; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.144.23 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> From: Kasper Nielsen Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:50:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Saint-Andre Cc: urn@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c60ae559c2d05553f6ff5" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 21:50:26 -0000 --f403045c60ae559c2d05553f6ff5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Sorry for the long delay was away on vacation. Am I right in understanding that as a general an application like mine would no longer have a RFC as an outcome? But "only" a registration of the namespace with IANA. Best Kasper On 9 July 2017 at 01:17, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Hi Kaspar, > > The two most recent registrations (ISBN and ISSN) follow the new > template, and they are excellent examples: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn > > By the way, you no longer need to submit an Internet-Draft, although > that is helpful for purposes of review. > > Peter > > On 7/8/17 2:21 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled the > > draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are > > there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for > > restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml > > > > I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have > > these chapters > > > > Introduction > > Specification Template > > Namespace ID > > Registration Information > > ... > > Examples > > Namespace Considerations > > Community Considerations > > Security Considerations > > IANA Considerations > > > > But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template. > > What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything into = a > > specification chapter? > > > > Best > > Kasper > > > > > > On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre > > wrote: > > > > Hi Kaspar, > > > > Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the > careful > > documentation in Internet-Draft form. > > > > RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the > > registration template has changed (based on many years of experienc= e > > with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Dra= ft > > you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and > process. > > Please refer to RFC 8141 for details: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141 > > > > > > Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the > specification > > so that we can review it again. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Peter > > > > On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to > > Navigation > > > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a > > > registration request for the urn =E2=80=9Cmrn=E2=80=9D. > > > > > > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and > > > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international > technical > > > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of > > marine aids > > > to navigation. > > > > > > The detail about the request can be seen at > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 > > > > > > > > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further > information > > > to process the request. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > Kasper Nielsen > > > > > > IT Architect > > > Danish Maritime Authority > > > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 > > > 2500 Valby > > > Denmark > > > +45 26737340 > > > > > > > > > --f403045c60ae559c2d05553f6ff5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Peter,

Sorry for the long delay was = away on vacation.
Am I right in understanding that as a general a= n application like mine would no longer have a RFC as an outcome?
But "only" a registration of the namespace with IANA.
=
Best
=C2=A0 Kasper

On 9 July 2017 at 01:17, Peter Saint-= Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
Hi Kaspar,

The two most recent registrations (ISBN and ISSN) follow the new
template, and they are excellent examples:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isb= n

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/iss= n

By the way, you no longer need to submit an Internet-Draft, although
that is helpful for purposes of review.

Peter

On 7/8/17 2:21 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled= the
> draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are=
> there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for
> restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at
> https://www.iana.org/a= ssignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
>
> I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have > these chapters
>
> Introduction
> Specification Template
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Namespace ID
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Registration Information
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0...
> Examples
> Namespace Considerations
> Community Considerations
> Security Considerations
> IANA Considerations
>
> But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template. > What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything into= a
> specification chapter?
>
> Best
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Kasper
>
>
> On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Hi Kaspar,
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID= and for the careful
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0documentation in Internet-Draft form.
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 814= 1, and the
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0registration template has changed (based on many ye= ars of experience
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0with registration of new namespaces). As a result, = the Internet-Draft
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0you have posted is not quite conformant to the new = template and process.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Please refer to RFC 8141 for details:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141<= /a>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8= 141>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Please let us know when you have posted version -03= of the specification
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0so that we can review it again.
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Best Regards,
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Peter
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Greetings,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> On behalf of the International Association of = Marine Aids to
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Navigation
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would= like to submit a
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> registration request for the urn =E2=80=9Cmrn= =E2=80=9D.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> The International Association of Marine Aids t= o Navigation and
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit,= international technical
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> association servicing more than 80 countries i= n the field of
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0marine aids
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> to navigation.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> The detail about the request can be seen at >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> https://tools.ietf= .org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://tools.ietf.= org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Please contact me and let me know in case you = need further information
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> to process the request.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Best Regards
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Kasper Nielsen
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> IT Architect
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Danish Maritime Authority
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> 2500 Valby
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Denmark
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> +45 26737340 <tel:%2B45%2026737340>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>
>


--f403045c60ae559c2d05553f6ff5-- From nobody Wed Jul 26 14:57:21 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711AE131DFE for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:57:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=dpJIQbkL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Yr/F5S8p Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihpwXubJUZVJ for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1139D127601 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4B020BFF; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:57:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:57:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=QPqvAvagkv9ORACAR9 lARgEbtUBHKDsIsk1oX6ZKDB0=; b=dpJIQbkLtapyhx5Q6w0IQ92yiVRdTNvuWH q0Wgr8poD1eWM12EhRP9VtaATrADSCZXelOh2F7DksyxMWS9G/2TDJxEs/7t0AqK 37QPAD6DnfvZp9kyc6J6J958tyYMBgM/QSTsGtGZpTnAs8mLr0hXJpkbutMq2pd3 V7nHfDyESoyARDKOHkU+l5JPKHN6pZ6wwXrB1FgT0yRzbScbZ1Auo/GqyEY5fNJk kMR8k8ws1tOfEZ65wiZYinwU94MCQ89JZdtR14Lxj5ZIIdFcs5QZW/Qbu7ltYwz4 Xugp2iNa/UF7Sr8J0nYlOlJUF8GAsLksTS27DbcbOgmUQjeCb+hA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=QPqvAvagkv9ORACAR9lARgEbtUBHKDsIsk1oX6ZKDB0=; b=Yr/F5S8p ax0i0BpSOp5fkDtvyJr08uYjECUC6KliL+O87Laj+L88CZ3p+Q1cpYmwET8uOqU/ Fvn+KhWOL5ScxEs1k3BBWPUdncQTaeU1+/1iNzFu3AYrUI1X63K4XOp/jk2JKywt RNBDcE7ztYVpYHOzfAWt0mUBsRZhthDezpnr6iwlo6XUE382utbS51YLreJYt6It Zz4F47TxbVhEXCQ4EAj2vDVo+4exEh+tOFLo4n9PFXy258paqBum2TTSStJ06gxO AiRIRQ2hAOdLGleuau748+t1sWw5+lltDnKTQYNMX18PRkfW58ylnqMnIXZcgFOn SszdVLtiyC+/gQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: XiKeVqSNcG9fc0NHM6joXcXIiK5UL1RU+iscvDwFlKkH 1501106236 Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.4.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9DFD2459C; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:57:15 -0400 (EDT) To: Kasper Nielsen References: <03a0480a-6ed4-51ce-5a34-f311c5a1b4c6@stpeter.im> Cc: urn@ietf.org From: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:57:15 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 21:57:19 -0000 That is correct! On 7/26/17 3:50 PM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Sorry for the long delay was away on vacation. > Am I right in understanding that as a general an application like mine > would no longer have a RFC as an outcome? > But "only" a registration of the namespace with IANA. > > Best > Kasper > > On 9 July 2017 at 01:17, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > Hi Kaspar, > > The two most recent registrations (ISBN and ISSN) follow the new > template, and they are excellent examples: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn > > > By the way, you no longer need to submit an Internet-Draft, although > that is helpful for purposes of review. > > Peter > > On 7/8/17 2:21 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled the > > draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are > > there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for > > restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml > > > > > I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have > > these chapters > > > > Introduction > > Specification Template > > Namespace ID > > Registration Information > > ... > > Examples > > Namespace Considerations > > Community Considerations > > Security Considerations > > IANA Considerations > > > > But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template. > > What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything > into a > > specification chapter? > > > > Best > > Kasper > > > > > > On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre > > >> wrote: > > > > Hi Kaspar, > > > > Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for > the careful > > documentation in Internet-Draft form. > > > > RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the > > registration template has changed (based on many years of > experience > > with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the > Internet-Draft > > you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template > and process. > > Please refer to RFC 8141 for details: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141 > > > > > > > > Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the > specification > > so that we can review it again. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Peter > > > > On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to > > Navigation > > > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a > > > registration request for the urn “mrn”. > > > > > > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and > > > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international > technical > > > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of > > marine aids > > > to navigation. > > > > > > The detail about the request can be seen at > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02 > > > > > > > > > > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further > information > > > to process the request. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > Kasper Nielsen > > > > > > IT Architect > > > Danish Maritime Authority > > > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31 > > > 2500 Valby > > > Denmark > > > +45 26737340 > > > > > > >