Subject: RE: 3GPP v6-only IMS [RE: WG Last Call: 3GPP Analysis Document]

From: Soliman Hesham <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 05:09:08 -0400

Pekka, 

I have mo more to add to this discussion. Good
luck with this noble goal.

Hesham

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[email-masked]]
 > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:05 AM
 > To: Soliman Hesham
 > Cc: 'Alain Durand'; [email-masked]
 > Subject: RE: 3GPP v6-only IMS [RE: WG Last Call: 3GPP 
 > Analysis Document]
 > 
 > 
 > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Soliman Hesham wrote:
 > >  > Especially in this case, the v4 NATs are particulatly 
 > troublesome, 
 > >  > upgrading those voip boxes to dual-stack would (help) the 
 > >  > two birds with 
 > >  > one stone: make it easier to use VoIP by the broadband 
 > >  > users, and to be 
 > >  > able to better interconnect to other phones, like 3GPP.
 > > 
 > > => You don't have to convince me that upgrading to 
 > > v6 is a good thing. Trust me, I believe it. But the 
 > > fact is, lots of people won't do it for a very long time.
 > 
 > So, we need to give the people an incentive to do the upgrade.  Calls
 > between 3GPP and their home systems ( == cheaper calls) 
 > could be a very
 > selling argument.
 > 
 > -- 
 > Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
 > Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
 > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
 > 
 >