Subject: [v6ops] 6to4-historic summary point: 10. "This is internally inconsistent with S 1: "Declaring the mechanism historic is not expected to have immediate product implications.""

From: Fred Baker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:18:31 -0700

> 10. "This is internally inconsistent with S 1: "Declaring the mechanism historic is not expected to have
>    immediate product implications.""
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   - What's the point if the goal is not to have immediate product implications?
> 
>   - First sentence of S 1 is misleading as already discussed and should
>     be removed/rephrased.  No need to even mention the BGP model.
> 
>   - It might make sense, if that statement is confusing, to remove the statement. I think the authors are trying
>     to be pragmatic - "we understand that all software in the world isn't going to change overnight;
>     as it changes, this is the direction we'd like it to go".
> 
> Action: Remove statement.

Does the working group agree with the summarization of the concern? Do we agree with the proposed action?

Reply if the answer is "no", and give a better suggestion.