Subject: Re: [v6ops] Request for Operations Directorate Review of draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01 by 2011-07-08

From: Joel Jaeggli <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:39:02 -0700

It was requested that I review rfc1150bis-01 for operational considerations. 

I believe that the conclusion of the FYI document series has no implications for operations generally.

In the context of IETF OPS area procedures, a future document superseding an existing FYI document example rfc 2901 might be identified as a BCP or variously by it's other standards or non-standards  (informational) track status.

joel

On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Tina Tsou wrote:

> Hello,
> As a member of the Operations Directorate you are being asked to review
> the following draft which is in IETF last call for it's operational
> impact.
> 
> IETF Last Call:
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iesg-rfc1150bis/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iesg-rfc1150bis/
> 
> Please provide comments and review to the Ops-dir mailing list
> ([email-masked]) by 2011-07-08, and include the authors of the
> draft as well.
> 
> A Check-list of possible questions/topics to address in an OPS-DIR 
> review may be found in Appendix A of RFC 5706.
> Only include the questions that apply to your review.
> 
> Would you add the review requests and update the status yourself at our wiki
> page?
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/Directorates
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Tina
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com
> 
>