Subject: [v6ops] Reminder: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address

From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:27:04 -0700

Greetings,

I oppose this draft in its current form.  As others have stated here, the requirement to carry a WKP everywhere in the network.  The chances of abuse are high, and the ability to track is limited, to say the least.  If necessary, a ivi provider COULD use some of their own (or 1918) address space to generate the ICMP source address, if required.  This should NOT leave the administrative horizon, however.

	Chris

--  
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf
Check my calendar availability: https://tungle.me/cdl