Subject: Re: [v6ops] FYI v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 84

From: Fernando Gont <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:12:50 -0300

Hi, Joel,

On 06/01/2012 01:02 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> Conflicts to Avoid:
>  First Priority: 6man behave homenet softwire
>  Second Priority: 6renum
>  Third Priority: opsarea opsawg
[....]
> 
> If there are notable conflict that we should have listed but don't, that
> would be could to know.

opsec should probably be included as "first priority", since at least at
the Paris IETF a number of v6-operations docuements were presented at
opsec (and in some cases, I think they were presented both in v6ops and
opsec).

Just my 2 cents.

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [email-masked] || [email-masked]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1