Subject: Re: [v6ops] Problem in citing http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:45:00 +0200

Dear Joel, all,

FYI, a new version is now available at: 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-03

Comments are more than welcome; particularly about this section

     2.1.  IPv6 May Also Be Concerned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6

The new version of the draft does not include any recommendation as this was objected during the intarea wglc.

The document can be cited for various purposes, e.g.,:
(1) acknowledge the technical issue
(2) point to the definition of the HOST_ID concept
(3) list candidate solutions
(4) pick a favourite solution for a given deployment context.

Cheers,
Med 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] De 
>la part de joel jaeggli
>Envoyé : lundi 23 juillet 2012 03:25
>À : IPv6 Ops WG
>Objet : [v6ops] Problem in citing 
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
>
>I have seen in at least two discussions recently as well as a document 
>that I'm reviewing citations of:
>
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
>
>   Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier 
>(HOST_ID)
>   in Shared Address Deployments
>
> From my vantage point this document analyzes the solution space, it 
>does not solve the problem of host identification in 
>particular it does 
>not today mitigate problems with source identification through 
>translation.
>
>Pointing to this document as solution, is IMHO tantamount to saying 
>there isn't an operationally relevant solution, and should be 
>acknowledged accordingly.
>
>The analysis in my opinion is a terribly important document and we 
>should read it closely, and use it to inform work on the problem.
>
>thanks
>joel
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>