Subject: Re: [v6ops] single /64, ND Proxy, and draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-07.txt

From: joel jaeggli <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:23:10 -0700

On 8/26/12 4:28 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> As for the tethered service, I think, there are still large cellular operators in the U.S. who support the IPhone and not any tethering.  So why is a hack such as the ND Proxy being pushed for tethering?  Why not just add DHCPv6 PD to the UE and then the CLAT also uses a prefix from the DHCPv6 PD?
This seems like any uneceesarily specific observation. 
at&t/t-mobile/sprint/verizon all have tethered service offerings. how 
they market those and to which products they apply them is not germain 
to the discussion of how to offer the service.