Subject: Re: [v6ops] comment on draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment-00

From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:34:45 +0000

Hi Erik,

Boarding to the plane right now … so reading too quickly, however if I understood your point correctly, I think you’re right with that recommendation.

Let’s see what other folks in the list (v6ops in copy) believe.

Thanks!

Regards,
Jordi

-----Mensaje original-----
De: <[email-masked]> en nombre de Erik Nygren <[email-masked]>
Responder a: <[email-masked]>
Fecha: viernes, 10 de noviembre de 2017, 16:27
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <[email-masked]>
Asunto: comment on draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment-00

    Would it make sense to call out in draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment-00
    
    that even if DNS64 isn't in-use that explicitly returning the NAT64 prefix as part
    
    of a AAAA response to "ipv4only.arpa" is strongly recommended (or required)?

            Erik

    [happy to post to list, and also feel free to CC to list.]

**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.