From gsalguei@cisco.com Fri Sep 27 15:09:18 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16D621F9E50; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:09:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EM6qqCUF9bSt; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DBC21F8E51; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3078; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1380319754; x=1381529354; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=RTsHxg6AO/eArGv9aWE0zEe/fvRvcd0kP5muWf+H2h0=; b=V02l1IRYwg2z6PFm0WqEhFH6i4IQJ4M5KfRAsDYlfMRCDMaLB7+A7H2b dEGRlcd937I1sEo4dAjtYepnfuDTIcOwJ9BQaPfUoJP6G5hzFpVzTHwGB aFyaBQVrTRHBA3FfQZB3IVZFNtEN+gvLHvbcLMpRNpM7rp2wyGbTgMs6i k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFACABRlKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABBGoMHOFLAU4EhFnSCJQEBAQMBAQEBNxQgCwULAgEZAwECCwIJCRAnCgEbAggCBAENBQgBCwcCBIdfBgw2uVWOCA+BCTECCwSDFYEBA5kuiw+FOoMkgXE5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,996,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="265472757" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2013 22:09:13 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8RM9Cmh023868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:09:13 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.202]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:09:12 -0500 From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" To: webfinger , "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" Thread-Topic: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger Thread-Index: AQHOu8q8WK9MXW8PR0WCym9pkH25Xw== Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:09:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20130927213711.8CCB5B1E00B@rfc-editor.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.132.55] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "webfinger@googlegroups.com" Subject: [webfinger] Fwd: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:09:19 -0000 [Forgive the cross-post...] Finally, we've arrived! Thanks to the many of you who generously contribu= ted. An especially big shout out to Paul Jones for his passion and dedicat= ion, who as editor had the unenviable job of trying to appease everyone. Cheers, Gonzalo Begin forwarded message: > From: > Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger > Date: September 27, 2013 5:37:11 PM EDT > To: , > Cc: , , >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 7033 >=20 > Title: WebFinger=20 > Author: P. Jones, G. Salgueiro, > M. Jones, J. Smarr > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: September 2013 > Mailbox: paulej@packetizer.com,=20 > gsalguei@cisco.com,=20 > mbj@microsoft.com, > jsmarr@google.com > Pages: 28 > Characters: 61552 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-18.txt >=20 > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7033.txt >=20 > This specification defines the WebFinger protocol, which can be used > to discover information about people or other entities on the > Internet using standard HTTP methods. WebFinger discovers > information for a URI that might not be usable as a locator > otherwise, such as account or email URIs. >=20 > This document is a product of the Applications Area Working Group Working= Group of the IETF. >=20 > This is now a Proposed Standard. >=20 > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestio= ns > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet > Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and > status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_se= arch.php > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > rfc-dist mailing list > rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > http://www.rfc-editor.org From Michael.Jones@microsoft.com Fri Sep 27 15:42:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F84211E8102; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:42:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOkgC0KPYN2c; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0243.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B1811E80DE; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLUPR03CA028.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.30.21) by BLUPR03MB036.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.209.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:42:42 +0000 Received: from BN1AFFO11FD039.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::195) by BLUPR03CA028.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:879::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:42:42 +0000 Received: from mail.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BN1AFFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.52.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.785.10 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:42:41 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14MBXC290.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.39]) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0136.001; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:41:52 +0000 From: Mike Jones To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" , webfinger , "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" Thread-Topic: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger Thread-Index: AQHOu85GOj0585jG5Eq7Bb0S+TyY4JnaLa1Q Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:41:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394371FFCE41@TK5EX14MBXC290.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> References: <20130927213711.8CCB5B1E00B@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.72] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51704005)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(69234005)(13464003)(478834004)(16601075003)(77982001)(59766001)(20776003)(63696002)(15202345003)(66066001)(74706001)(15188155005)(81542001)(80022001)(65816001)(79102001)(83072001)(69226001)(56816003)(6806004)(50466002)(47776003)(16799955002)(19300405004)(81342001)(54356001)(23726002)(53806001)(56776001)(81816001)(15975445006)(74876001)(44976005)(76482001)(47976001)(50986001)(4396001)(80976001)(49866001)(51856001)(19580405001)(74502001)(47736001)(55846006)(19580395003)(83322001)(46102001)(31966008)(77096001)(54316002)(74366001)(47446002)(76786001)(76796001)(74662001)(81686001)(33656001)(46406003)(562404015)(6606295002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB036; H:mail.microsoft.com; CLIP:131.107.125.37; FPR:; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-O365ENT-EOP-Header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY) X-Forefront-PRVS: 098291215C X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com Cc: "webfinger@googlegroups.com" Subject: Re: [webfinger] [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:42:48 -0000 FYI, I've posted about this at http://self-issued.info/?p=3D1125 and on Twi= tter as @selfissued. Have a good weekend, everyone! -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 3:09 PM To: webfinger; apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols Cc: webfinger@googlegroups.com Subject: [apps-discuss] Fwd: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger [Forgive the cross-post...] Finally, we've arrived! Thanks to the many of you who generously contribu= ted. An especially big shout out to Paul Jones for his passion and dedicat= ion, who as editor had the unenviable job of trying to appease everyone. Cheers, Gonzalo Begin forwarded message: > From: > Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 7033 on WebFinger > Date: September 27, 2013 5:37:11 PM EDT > To: , > Cc: , ,=20 > >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 7033 >=20 > Title: WebFinger=20 > Author: P. Jones, G. Salgueiro, > M. Jones, J. Smarr > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: September 2013 > Mailbox: paulej@packetizer.com,=20 > gsalguei@cisco.com,=20 > mbj@microsoft.com, > jsmarr@google.com > Pages: 28 > Characters: 61552 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-18.txt >=20 > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7033.txt >=20 > This specification defines the WebFinger protocol, which can be used=20 > to discover information about people or other entities on the Internet=20 > using standard HTTP methods. WebFinger discovers information for a=20 > URI that might not be usable as a locator otherwise, such as account=20 > or email URIs. >=20 > This document is a product of the Applications Area Working Group Working= Group of the IETF. >=20 > This is now a Proposed Standard. >=20 > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track=20 > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and=20 > suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of=20 > the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the=20 > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this = memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see=20 > http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the=20 > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. =20 > Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are=20 > for unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > rfc-dist mailing list > rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > http://www.rfc-editor.org _______________________________________________ apps-discuss mailing list apps-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss