From nobody Mon May 3 09:26:41 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2613E3A1B07 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yb1i_CX5oiW9 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCDC3A185D for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id y9so2490862ljn.6 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XH0CLyLqr1o1UTZx8wfeTVBPwj13ApPqtPg1qTXUIVE=; b=C6C5zn+nMKNMRk9nLvGe6KwwQSNyE1VCg7hP1c3dPgipfG/7TF4cdTIf8hudLdPxWd IU6HIPC/Sz/Ktn2mvq4PiFIJpC4BF+lYhDVN3078Xk0WvZK6sKAPKd5uQuCt5UXuWQVu AQc2cJrtCvBdnPgBFTsplz71QihKusMwiSfDtnlm0QlyNnW0M3mfZ8Sx4ACLHFUR1KaP E6RNnwNABs35JBYKxtfcNmz4qRbBPdytkKFnpduLzbsKQ+xf9hvxVcjQCUN7k+ooF46a eLAO33AkEdzmd+qB7CYxnZw/PPy6PEkHpr+wN85o9NZ3Yfp3zt2pYlM9ku+Zw/p53U4A /B2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XH0CLyLqr1o1UTZx8wfeTVBPwj13ApPqtPg1qTXUIVE=; b=rFKdZvACyjHzaykrVc066Db++htbId5H5AdfgzDd1Kw4hVNmO2zO3EXBILJ8/qQCik 76mMZp9SzLCgH/xoFl5x3D5jLDGm5AtokUoip4yu4gLyk/HrBvRN2NhLWSP8Ukz9VA0X y/M8U5iQ/RQKlDlpenBaURC3cbqKfQ4WX2/Hd45d7viseHwcFx91YKRp7i4DomuP7GSo J42AXK1LMb7ZzAgejHAruyIuJIw4dp0WSWTIw/cVX891XfbAJdLYadNT7oJCXn7ORkpz aC3KaHztvCqm1JbNlr63AAykRBzE+3aOvihd1QQsYjEg1X3cvcQt1Q6SxJpgMrIeRAPH sQCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330mB4dr8I9kH2QKcct7JcIZ7zuhSqq23gJvtC0vkZzWeijjaqk FKH2PpCXupI4fGN6HshGKMuu2zJX/BbCwlbLnGrtxFED8m8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqgYn0iNPZKR9/1hrLETUYpYYCsmJN66eoVD1hOPY69LvoG7UnCSkMx9S92OCMgamOcQlndyZDCoEt7MtXrL4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:140d:: with SMTP id u13mr2563500lje.145.1620059192561; Mon, 03 May 2021 09:26:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48a9e368-6a0e-357a-75e5-9e1d3135a0b5@gmx.de> <9FF645F2-7982-4B6A-935A-A96167BBF887@tzi.org> <50135A5A-1322-4653-B0B5-04356ECB405C@tzi.org> <4bb32ea2-9802-3899-de6e-e0411876b89b@gmx.de> <7b71aa76-3159-217a-123c-19cd48c564c4@gmx.de> <2c594bca-2b40-f22e-7918-3b9d86464527@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <2c594bca-2b40-f22e-7918-3b9d86464527@nostrum.com> From: Greg Mirsky Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 09:26:21 -0700 Message-ID: To: Robert Sparks Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b014b305c16f6c2e" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple email addresses in
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 16:26:40 -0000 --000000000000b014b305c16f6c2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Robert, thank you for your advice, it's very useful to me. I've checked the list and both addresses that I include marked as active (though one is also primary). Interestingly, Last week I've sent my question to the tools team. Hope they will get back to me soon. Regards, Greg On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:53 PM Robert Sparks wrote: > Greg - > > Please look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/profile/ after you > have logged in. > > It lists the email addresses that have been associated with you. Any that > are not marked active will not be used. > > RjS > On 4/28/21 5:53 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Hi Julian, > thank you for booking into my issue. I've conducted a quick text sending > mail from each of my listed in the draft draft-mirsky-ippm-epm addresses to > draft-mirsky-ippm-epm@ietf.org. Message from the first address had not > arrived at the secondary address. But when I've sent it from the > second-listed address - it arrived at the first. I've found that on the > Email Expansion page in the datatracker only the first address is listed. > The second address is nowhere to be found. > > Hope that helps to identify the problem. > > Regards, > Greg > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:13 PM Julian Reschke > wrote: > >> Am 28.04.2021 um 20:01 schrieb Greg Mirsky: >> > Hi Julian, et al., >> > I've moved to use v3 and now list two addresses. What I've noticed, that >> > correspondence is directed only to the first listed address, not to both >> > addresses listed. Do you think that is a feature or a bug? >> > ... >> >> Which kind of correspondence? >> >> Best regards, Julian >> > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing listxml2rfc@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > > --000000000000b014b305c16f6c2e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Robert,
thank you for your advice, it's very us= eful to me. I've checked the list and both addresses that I include mar= ked as active (though one is also primary). Interestingly, Last week I'= ve sent my question to the tools team. Hope they will get back to me soon.<= /div>

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021= at 1:53 PM Robert Sparks <rjspa= rks@nostrum.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20

Greg -

Please look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/profile/ after you have logged in.

It lists the email addresses that have been associated with you. Any that are not marked active will not be used.

RjS

On 4/28/21 5:53 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
=20
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:13 PM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 28.04.2021 um 20:01 schrieb Greg Mirsky:
> Hi Julian, et al.,
> I've moved to use v3 and now list two addresses. What I've noticed, that
> correspondence is directed only to the first listed address, not to both
> addresses listed. Do you think that is a feature or a bug?
> ...

Which kind of correspondence?

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
xml2rfc mailing list
xml2rfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
--000000000000b014b305c16f6c2e-- From nobody Sat May 29 17:55:19 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F72E3A26D0 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:55:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkYx93Ta_xbp for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CF13A26D1 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 17:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ln9jR-0006Wk-Jx for xml2rfc@ietf.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 00:55:10 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 17:55:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: XML2RFC Interest Group User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] the case of the disappearing refs X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 00:55:17 -0000 two days ago, i could successfully xml2rfc draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.xml --html --text a v2 document. today, it pukes xml2rfc draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.xml --html --text Error: Unable to parse the XML document: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.xml draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.xml: Line 695: Unable to resolve external request: "reference.RFC.2119" make: *** [all] Error 1 with the accused being the first ref and $ env | grep XML_LIBRARY XML_LIBRARY=.:/Users/randy/refs/rfc:/Users/randy/refs/id $ ls -l /Users/randy/refs/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml -rw-rw-r-- 1 randy staff 868 May 28 09:35 /Users/randy/refs/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml turns out /usr/local/bin/xml2rfc $ head -1 /usr/local/bin/xml2rfc #!/usr/bin/python2 works, but $ head -1 /usr/local/bin/xml2rfc #!/usr/bin/python3 does not $ xml2rfc --version xml2rfc 2.32.0 on big sur xml at https://github.com/massimocandela/draft-ymbk-finding-geofeeds randy --- randy@psg.com `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy@psg.com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery From nobody Sun May 30 02:40:58 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438FD3A3635 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:40:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_vDTK49PTKj for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337943A3634 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from client-0077.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0077.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FtD1q3GXWz315l; Sun, 30 May 2021 11:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 11:40:47 +0200 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644060447.001089-dcad4ad6a947fc76915433ca9a17bcbf Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5D36AAB8-CBD6-4CCF-94E3-F23FBA7C1270@tzi.org> References: To: Randy Bush X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] the case of the disappearing refs X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 09:40:56 -0000 On 2021-05-30, at 02:55, Randy Bush wrote: >=20 > No idea about the python2 vs. python3 observation (I don=E2=80=99t have = a python2 environment to test this on), but I need to make this work (xml2rfc 3.7.0; I then upgraded to 3.8.0 to see the = same; with Python 3.9). Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Sun May 30 07:10:23 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536523A3D98 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:10:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmL5cer_OJxs for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DF13A3D94 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnM8u-00006U-94; Sun, 30 May 2021 14:10:16 +0000 Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 07:10:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Carsten Bormann Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group In-Reply-To: <5D36AAB8-CBD6-4CCF-94E3-F23FBA7C1270@tzi.org> References: <5D36AAB8-CBD6-4CCF-94E3-F23FBA7C1270@tzi.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] the case of the disappearing refs X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 14:10:22 -0000 >> > ^^^^ did it that's new to me it makes, yay! thanks! but i am now getting Warning: Setting consensus="true" for IETF STD document (this is not the schema default, but is the only value permitted for this type of document) in the prologue does not help. and issue https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma.org/issues/315 is too light a clue bat for me at this caffeine level randy From nobody Sun May 30 08:20:57 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4113A3F83 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:20:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIqhCKWvJFhs for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB823A3F80 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from client-0077.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0077.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FtMZ355wCz3165; Sun, 30 May 2021 17:20:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 17:20:43 +0200 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644080843.323211-50b893a995f6679bef855da1eb5f05f5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5D36AAB8-CBD6-4CCF-94E3-F23FBA7C1270@tzi.org> To: Randy Bush X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] the case of the disappearing refs X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 15:20:55 -0000 On 2021-05-30, at 16:10, Randy Bush wrote: >=20 > Warning: Setting consensus=3D"true" for IETF STD document (this is = not the schema default, but is the only value permitted for this type of = document) This is a warning and just tells you that xml2rfc is going to do what = needs to be done. To get rid of the warning as well, make sure your tag has = a consensus attribute: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7423A3F9C for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:24:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qCjMH1Da984 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8BC3A3F9B for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnNIa-0000Kp-EH; Sun, 30 May 2021 15:24:20 +0000 Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:24:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Carsten Bormann Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group In-Reply-To: References: <5D36AAB8-CBD6-4CCF-94E3-F23FBA7C1270@tzi.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] the case of the disappearing refs X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 15:24:23 -0000 > To get rid of the warning as well, make sure your tag has a > consensus attribute: > >