From ben@nostrum.com Wed Oct 10 08:53:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26EC21F86F6 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0hp-YZPKi9Y for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5682B21F86F5 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.12.11.64] ([4.30.77.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9AFrDSI046063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:53:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2BA5BF7E-E1C3-488E-AB5A-926ABF1980B5@nostrum.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:54:00 -0500 To: XMPP Group Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 4.30.77.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Subject: [xmpp] XMPP Meeting Canceled X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:53:57 -0000 Hi Everyone, We are canceling the XMPP meeting at IETF85. It looks like most of our = work is either waiting for output of other working groups, or otherwise = not in a state where we need a full workgroup meeting to move forward. = We currently expect that we will have a meeting at IETF86 in March, and = hope to see everyone there.=20 We apologize for the late notice and related inconvenience, and hope = that XMPP participants that planned to attend IETF85 will still do so. = Even without an XMPP meeting, there's plenty of interesting work going = on. Thanks! Ben. From stpeter@stpeter.im Tue Oct 16 08:10:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1963311E809A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:10:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.636 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcP00ywPOpu4 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847BD21F88BD for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EF714011B for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:13:14 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <507D78EE.3020602@stpeter.im> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:10:38 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XMPP Working Group References: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <507D78C6.1040103@stpeter.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xmpp] Fwd: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:10:41 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 FYI. - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Simple] updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:09:58 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre To: simple@ietf.org Last night I refreshed the following specifications covering protocol mappings between SIP and XMPP for addresses and errors, presence, single messages, one-to-one chat sessions, and multi-user chat... https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-presence https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-im https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat These specs have been around in one form or another for years. More recently, a number of people have asked me whether they can be finished off and published as RFCs. I think they can, although the specs farther down the list are a bit less mature and need to be aligned with work on MSRP and SIMPLE-based chat. I've received feedback offlist in the last few months about several of these (especially the groupchat spec), which I have not yet incorporated, but I will endeavor to do that soon. Thanks for listening, Peter _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list Simple@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB9eO4ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzrJACfYkZg++I5tiNJMMJYpcYSt6hE KN0An20lbuS0J0TAMYyTrgV9gM1degSN =4rPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Sun Oct 21 12:37:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED54221F8A0F for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfpyKIrVVNRW for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169E321F8A0D for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BB913B1E002; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:32:24 -0700 (PDT) To: psaintan@cisco.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, jhildebr@cisco.com, ben@nostrum.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20121021193224.BB913B1E002@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Cc: me@toddlucas.net, xmpp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [xmpp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6121 (3391) X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:37:59 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6121, "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6121&eid=3391 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Todd Lucas Section: 4.3.2.1. Original Text ------------- Juliet's server replies with an unavailable notification, mirroring the 'id' of Rome's presence probe because there is no 'id' to preserve from an available notification that her client has sent. Corrected Text -------------- Juliet's server replies with an unavailable notification, mirroring the 'id' of Romeo's presence probe because there is no 'id' to preserve from an available notification that her client has sent. Notes ----- Minor typo: "Rome's" should be "Romeo's" Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6121 (draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-20) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence Publication Date : March 2011 Author(s) : P. Saint-Andre Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From stpeter@stpeter.im Wed Oct 31 15:47:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB69621F8886 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dFnD7Oe3XVvb for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D0721F889A for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAD234011B; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:50:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <5091AA81.6040806@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:47:29 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XMPP Working Group X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xmpp] XMPP over WebSocket X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:47:31 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At the XMPP Summit last week, we talked a bit about XMPP and the web, including the I-D that Jack Moffitt has worked on for XMPP over WebSocket: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket/ Jack said he thinks it is ready to move forward, and I agreed to shepherd it. I then pinged the HYBI WG and XMPP WG chairs, who appeared to agree that it would be good to discuss the spec on the XMPP WG list and eventually seek cross-WG review from the HYBI folks. Does anyone here have feedback on the spec? I know that several teams have implemented it, so if you want to see it move forward to RFC then please review it and send comments to the xmpp@ietf.org list. Thanks! Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCRqoEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyhcQCgoOZE57eK0a+j31SzKfS+mROL KIIAn3qdf3RcfxCt2Qsj5fS/DmYI0A6r =gXW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----