]>

cxres+ietf@protonmail.com

Applications and Real-Time HTTP notifications pubsub Per Resource Events is a minimal protocol built on top of HTTP that allows clients to receive notifications directly from any resource of interest. The Per Resource Events Protocol (PREP) is predicated on the idea that the most intuitive source for notifications about changes made to a resource is the resource itself. About This Document The latest revision of this draft can be found at . Status information for this document may be found at . Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group mailing list (), which is archived at . Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at .

Introduction The Per Resource Events Protocol defines a minimal HTTP-based framework by which clients can securely receive update notifications directly from any resource of interest on the Open Web Platform.

Motivation HTTP was originally designed to transfer a static documents within a single request and response. If the document changes, HTTP does not automatically update clients with the new versions. This design was adequate for web pages that were mostly static and written by hand. But web-applications today are dynamic. They provide (near-)instantaneous updates across multiple clients and servers. The many workarounds developed over the years to provide real-time updates over HTTP have often proven to be inadequate. Web programmers instead resort to implementing custom messaging systems over alternate protocols such as WebSockets, which requires additional layers of code in the form of non-standard JavaScript frameworks to synchronize changes of state. Per Resource Events is a minimal protocol built on top of HTTP that allows clients to receive notifications directly from a resource of interest. Unlike other HTTP based solutions, Per Resource Events Protocol supports the use of arbitrary media-types for notifications, which can be negotiated just like representations; thus giving implementers a lot of flexibility to customize notifications according to the needs of their application. Our goal with the Per Resource Events Protocol is to make notification convenient for consumers. The Per Resource Events Protocol allows a client to receive notifications together with the representation, saving on the unnecessary round trip. With a library like PREP Fetch, Per Resource Events may be consumed in JavaScript with just a few lines of code:

PREP Fetch Example

How it Works

Consider an ordinary HTTP GET request:

A sample HTTP `GET` request

A client application that wishes to receive PREP notifications from a resource simply makes a GET request with just one additional Accept-Events header.

A minimal PREP notifications request

Additional parameters might be added to the Accept-Events header to negotiate the form of notifications as discussed in , .

If a server does not implement the Per Resource Events Protocol, the Accept-Events header in a GET request is simply ignored. The resource returns the current representation thereby preserving backwards compatibility. Let us presume this response is:

Response to the sample HTTP `GET` request

However, if the server supports the Per Resource Events Protocol, it sends a multipart response with the current representation followed any notifications.

The response now includes an additional Events headers which specifies prep as the notifications protocol and a status for the notifications response. As a courtesy, the response also includes the Vary header to indicate that response was influenced by the Accept-Events header in the request and the Accept-Events header itself for reactive negotiation in the future. The Content-type header now indicates a response body of multipart/mixed to reflect the two part response. Thus, we have the following response headers:

Response with PREP Notifications - Headers

The first part of this multipart response is the current representation of the resource:

Response with PREP Notifications - Current Representation

The client can request for this to be skipped by specifying a Last-Event-Id header set either to the ID of the previous representation or * as described in .

The second part of this multipart response is itself a multipart message that contains notifications. Upon a resource event, a notification is transmitted as a part of this multipart message. By default, notifications are sent in the message/rfc822 format (which is structurally identical to a HTTP/1.1 message) with some additional semantics as specified in . Alternate formats and semantics might be negotiated using the Accept-Events header. The response stream is closed when the time limit for notification has elapsed or immediately after the resource is deleted as in the example below:

Response with PREP Notifications - Notifications

Together, the complete response with PREP notifications is:

Complete Response

Scope The Per Resource Events Protocol specifies:

• a mechanism for the discovery of notification capabilities per resource,
• a mechanism to request notifications from a resource,
• representation and semantics for the response that transmits notifications,
• a default representation for notifications and associated semantics when used to transmit notifications.

The Per Resource Events Protocol does not specify:

• a specific authentication and authorization mechanism to be used with the Per Resource Events Protocol. Implementations are encouraged to use existing approaches for authentication and authorization.
• representation and semantics for notifications (other than the default case).
  • Implementations are free to use any media-type for notifications, which can be negotiated just like representations.
  • Implementations are also free to define additional semantics for a given media-type, when used to transmit notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol.

Audience This specification is for:

• Server developers who wish to enable clients to listen for updates to particular resources.
• Application developers who wish to implement a client to listen for updates to particular resources.

Design The Per Resource Events Protocol is predicated on a resource being the most intuitive source for notifications about its own updates. This is unlike other notification protocols that require additional resources to be specifically dedicated as endpoints for delivering notifications. Servers that provide updates are forced to maintain these additional endpoints and clients that consume these updates have to co-ordinate data between the endpoint and a resource of interest. By giving every resource the ability to send notifications when it updates, the Per Resource Events Protocol aims to reduce the complexity of both servers and clients implementing notifications; thus, making it easier for developers to build and maintain real-time applications.

Principles The Per Resource Events Protocol treats notifications as a temporally extended representation of any resource. That is, a representation can describe not (just) the state of the resource but events on the resource. With HTTP allowing representations to provide a potentially unbounded stream of data, the Per Resource Events Protocol is able to communicate events on the resource as notifications.

Goals The goals of the Per Resource Events Protocol are:

• to provide notifications only using the HTTP protocol STD97 so that the clients are able to request for update notifications using the Fetch API .
• to provide updates directly from the resource of interest, obliviating the need to connect to another endpoint for notifications, minimizing round-trips between clients and servers and the need to co-ordinate responses between a resource and the endpoint.
• to allow arbitrary representations for notifications. Implementers shall be able to provide notifications that are potentially more expressive when compared to existing HTTP based messaging protocols such as Server Sent Events .

Constraints To the extent feasible, the Per Resource Events Protocol:

• adheres to established practices and conventions. In particular, every attempt has been made to reuse existing protocols and specifications. Implementers shall be able to repurpose existing tools and libraries for implementing this specification.
• conforms to the REST Architectural Style and best practices for Building Protocols with HTTP . This specification can, thus, be used to extend the capabilities of any existing HTTP resource to provide notifications. Implementers shall be able to scale notifications along with their data/applications.

Known Limitations The Per Resource Events Protocol only allows notifications to be sent for events on a given resource. It is not possible for resources to send notifications for arbitrary events such as state changes on multiple resources or combinations thereof. Implementations using the Per Resource Events Protocol have to create separate resources to realize such notification endpoints. But this is no different from APIs built on top of existing messaging protocols (See, for example, and ). Browsers cap the number of persistent HTTP/1.1 connections per host, limiting the suitability of the Per Resource Events Protocol for web applications in the browser that simultaneously require notifications from multiple resources on the same host. This limitation is identical to that of other HTTP streaming based protocols, such as Server-Sent Events . Implementations are strongly encouraged to adopt HTTP/2 (or later). HTTP/1.1 servers might consider setting up a reverse proxy to serve PREP notifications over HTTP/2 (or later) or implement mitigation strategies, such as to maximize the number of concurrent connections and to provide alternate hosts for resources. Browser clients receiving PREP notifications over an HTTP/1.1 connection are advised to exercise caution when opening multiple simultaneous persistent connections to any given host.

Conformance

Document Conventions All assertions, diagrams, examples and notes in this specification are non-normative.

Requirements Notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Classes of Products The Per Resource Events Protocol identifies the following Classes of Products for conforming implementations. These products are referenced throughout this specification.

Resource Server

that builds on HTTP origin server () by defining header fields () and media types ().

Application Client

that builds on HTTP user agent () by defining behaviour in terms of fetching across the platform.

Interoperability Interoperability occurs between Application Client—Resource Server as defined by the Per Resource Events Protocol.

Application Client—Resource Server Interoperability

Interoperability of implementations for application clients and resource servers is tested by evaluating an implementation's ability to request and respond to HTTP messages that conform to the Per Resource Events Protocol.

Terminology The following terms are defined:

Notification

A message sent to application clients (that had previously requested it) when an HTTP request made on a resource fulfils some specified criteria.

Base Response

The response that would have been returned, were notifications not requested for, in an otherwise identical HTTP request.

Event Field

A parameter for a protocol item in the Accept-Events header field or a member of the Events header field.

Header Fields The Per Resource Events Protocol introduces new header fields. These header fields are not specific to the Per Resource Events Protocol. They can be used by other protocols that augment resources with the ability to send notifications. Protocols MUST ensure that the semantics be so defined that these header fields are safely ignored by recipients that do not recognize them ().

Accept-Events The Accept-Events header field can be used by application clients to specify their preferred protocol for receiving notifications. For example, the Accept-Events header field can be used to indicate that the request is specifically limited to a small set of desired protocols, as in the case for notifications with the Per Resource Events Protocol. When sent by a resource server in a response, the Accept-Events header field provides information about which notification protocols are preferred in a subsequent request to the same resource. An application client MAY generate a request for notifications regardless of having received an Accept-Events header field. The information only provides advice for the sake of improving performance and reducing unnecessary network transfers. Conversely, an application client MUST NOT assume that receiving an Accept-Events header field means that future requests will return notifications. The content might change, the server might only support notifications requests at certain times or under certain conditions, or a different intermediary might process the next request.

Validity A recipient MUST ignore the Accept-Events header field received with a request method that is unrecognized or for which notifications response is not defined for a particular notifications protocol. A recipient MUST ignore the Accept-Events header field received in response to a request method that is unrecognized or for which notifications discovery and/or response is not defined for a particular notifications protocol. A recipient MUST ignore the Accept-Events header field that it does not understand. A recipient MUST ignore the protocols specified in the Accept-Events header field that they are not aware of.

Syntax Accept-Events is a List structured () header field*. Its members MUST be of type string that identifies a notification protocol. A protocol identifier MAY be followed with zero or more parameters defined by the given protocol, which MAY be followed by a q parameter. The q parameter assigns a relative "weight" to the sender's preference for a notification protocol with semantics as defined in . Senders using weights SHOULD send q last (after all protocol parameters). Recipients SHOULD process any parameter named q as weight, regardless of parameter ordering. Note: Use of the q parameter name to negotiate notification protocols would interfere with any parameter having the same name. Hence, protocol parameters named q are disallowed.

Events The Events header field is sent by a resource server to provide event fields in response to a request for notifications. Where the Accept-Events header field sent in the request is ignored, a resource server MUST NOT send the Events header field in a response. Conversely, a resource server MUST send the Events header field in a response, if the Accept-Events header field sent in the request is not ignored.

Validity If the Events header field is sent in response to a request that does not contain the Accept-Events header field, the recipient MUST treat the response as invalid. If the response contains a Events header field that the recipient does not understand or the Events header field specifies a protocol that the recipient does not understand, the recipient MUST NOT process the response. A proxy that receives such a message SHOULD forward it downstream.

Syntax Events is a Dictionary structured () header field*. It MUST contain one member with the key protocol whose value identifies the notification protocol used in the response. It MAY contain other members that are defined by the given notification protocol.

Protocol

Event Fields The Per Resource Events Protocol reuses existing HTTP fields () as event fields. Any HTTP field MAY be used as an event field. For the limited context of notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol, an event field with the same name as an HTTP field MUST have identical semantics to that HTTP field, unless otherwise specified. This specification restricts Accept-Events and Events as Structured header fields* . From this it follows:

• An event field whose value is anything except a bare Item, that is, an Item without Parameters, MUST be specified inside an Inner List.
• Unless otherwise specified, an event field that is not already defined as a Structured Field, therefore, MUST be handled as a Retrofit Structured Field when such handling is defined.
• An event field that is not already defined as a Structured Field but cannot be handled as a Retrofit Structured Field either, MUST be explicitly specified by the implementation.

Methods For the Per Resource Events Protocol, HEAD () and GET () are the only methods in response to which notifications are advertised. A resource server MUST NOT send the Accept-Events header field with prep as a protocol in response to a request with any method other than HEAD or GET. For the Per Resource Events Protocol, GET () is the only method by which notifications are requested and for which notifications response is defined. An application client MUST NOT send the Accept-Events header field with prep as a protocol in a request with any method other than GET. A resource server MUST NOT send the Events header field with the parameter protocol with a value of prep in response to a request with any method other than GET. A resource server MUST NOT send the Events header field except in response to a GET request.

Status Codes The Per Resource Events Protocol reuses existing HTTP status codes () to describe the result of the request for notifications and the semantics of notifications in the response. In response to a request where Accept-Events header field indicates prep as the preferred protocol, a resource server that supports notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol MUST communicate the status code for the notifications response using the status parameter in the Events header field. For the limited context of notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol, the status code communicated using the status parameter in the Events header field MUST have identical semantics to the corresponding HTTP status code, unless otherwise specified.

Discovery Application clients can engage in reactive content negotiation to discover if a resource server supports notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol on a given resource.

Request An application client can discover the ability of a resource server to deliver PREP notifications for a target resource by sending a HEAD () request.

Not Available In the response to a HEAD request, a resource server that does not provide notifications for the target resource using the Per Resource Events Protocol MUST NOT list prep as as one of the available protocols in the Accept-Events header field.

Discovery Request

Available In response to a HEAD request, a resource server that serves notifications for the target resource using the Per Resource Events Protocol SHOULD include the Accept-Events header field, which MUST list prep as one of the available protocols. Associated with prep list item, the resource server MUST include an accept event field with at least one acceptable media-type for notifications.

Discovery Response

Request The Per Resource Events Protocol extends the content negotiation mechanism provided by HTTP allowing application clients to negotiate notifications independent of the base response. In order to receive notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol from a resource, an application client sends a GET request to resource server, which:

• MUST include the Accept-Events header field, which:
  • MUST list prep as a preferred notification protocol.
    • MAY include zero or more event fields. For example, application clients MAY specify an accept event field to indicate a preferred media-type for notifications.
• MAY include the Last-Event-ID header field (, Section 9.2.4) requesting the resource server to not send the base response body and resume notifications from the event occurring immediately after the one specified.

Request for Notifications

A resource server MUST ignore event fields for prep notifications in the Accept-Events header that it does not recognize or implement.

Response without Notifications

Not Available A resource server not implementing the Per Resource Events Protocol (or not supporting it for the target resource) can ignore a request for notifications and respond as if it received a normal request on that resource without impacting interoperability. A resource server that does not provide notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol MUST NOT:

• list prep as as one of the available protocols in the Accept-Events header field, if sent in the response.
• send the Events header field in the response with the protocol event field set to prep.

Error Response A resource server MUST NOT include PREP notifications in a response, unless request results in one of the following status codes:

• 200 (OK) (),
• 204 (No Content) (),
• 206 (Partial Content) (),
• 226 (IM Used) ().

A resource server that does not serve PREP notifications, on account of the response not having one of the above-mentioned status codes:

• SHOULD include the Events header fields where:
  • the protocol event field MUST be set to a value of prep,
  • the status event field MUST be set to 412 (Precondition Failed) () status code.

Notification Errors A resource server might still not be able to send notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol requested by an application client despite a valid response. A resource server unable to serve PREP notifications, even when the request results in a status code mentioned in :

• SHOULD include the Events header fields in the response where:
  • the protocol event field MUST be set to a value of prep,
  • the status event field MUST be set to appropriate status code indicating the reason for not serving notifications.

Notifications Response

Headers A resource server providing notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol:

• MUST include the following header fields in the response:
  • Date ().
  • Content-Type () with the media type set to multipart/mixed ().
  • Events which MUST include the following event fields:
    • protocol set to the value prep.
    • status set to the 200 (OK) () status code.
    • expires with an integer value in seconds indicating an interval after Date when notifications will no longer be sent and the response stream is closed.
    NOTE: Since caching is meaningless in the context of notifications, this specifications repurposes the deprecated Expires header field as an event field to specify when the notifications response ends.
• SHOULD include the following header fields in the response:
  • Vary () which MUST include the following values:
    • Accept-Events.
    • Last-Event-ID, if the request for PREP notifications included the Last-Event-ID header field that was not ignored by the resource server.
  • Last-Modified ().
• MAY include the following header fields in the response:
  • Accept-Events which MUST list prep as one of the available notification protocols. Associated with the prep list item, the resource server:
    • MUST include an accept event field with at least one acceptable media-type for notifications.

Body A resource server sending PREP Notifications MUST transmit a multipart message body () with a media type of multipart/mixed () with two body parts in the order specified below:

1. Base Response: the message body that would have been sent had notifications not been requested.
2. Notifications Response: the multipart response body with body parts containing notifications as defined in .

Base Response By default, the Per Resource Events Protocol requires a resource server to transmit the base response body as first body part of multipart response body. This behaviour is desirable in most scenarios as we short-circuit an extra round trip that would otherwise be needed to fetch the current representation of the resource before fetching notifications and eliminates the need to co-ordinate the two responses.

Opt out An application client requesting only notifications using the Per Resource Events Protocol needs to explicitly opt out of receiving the base response as described in , . If the request for PREP notifications includes the Last-Event-ID header field (, Section 9.2.4) which matches the Event-ID of the last event on the resource or wildcard character "*", a resource server SHOULD NOT send the content of the base response. The resource server MUST send still the first body part of the multipart response body, even if this part is empty. The resource server MAY send the headers corresponding to the representation body that would have been sent in the base response, and only omit the representation body of base response.

Notifications A resource server MUST transmit PREP notifications in the second body part of the multipart response as yet another embedded multipart message body (), with a media type of multipart/digest () that MAY include zero or more body parts. Each body part of the notifications multipart message body MAY contain at most one notification.

Termination A resource server MUST end the notification response in any one of the following scenarios:

• Once the time specified in the expires parameter of the Events header field has elapsed.
• Immediately after sending a notification upon a DELETE request on the resource that results in a response with 200 (OK) () or 204 (No Content) () status codes.

A resource server MUST properly terminate the multipart responses as defined in , before closing the response stream.

Examples

Response with Current Representation and Notifications

Notification Response with Representation included --main-boundary Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="next-message" --next-message Content-Type: message/rfc822 --next-message-- --main-boundary-- ]]>

Response with Notifications Only

Response with Notifications Only --next-message-- --main-boundary-- ]]>

Semantics for message/rfc822 notifications The multipart/digest multipart media-type () uses message/rfc822 media-type () for body parts as default. It follows that the Per Resource Events Protocol transmits notifications as message/rfc822, unless the application client requests otherwise.

Request An application clients MAY specify additional parameters to message/rfc822 notification media-type in the accept event field associated with the prep list item in the Accept-Events header field of the request.

Notification A resource server implementing the Per Resource Events Protocol SHOULD send a notification to an application client when a request with one of the following methods generates a response with any of the following status codes: Notification Triggers

Request Method	Response Status
PUT ()	200 (OK) ()
PATCH ()	204 (No Content) ()
DELETE ()
POST ()	200 (OK) ()
	204 (No Content) ()
	201 (Created) ()
	205 (Reset Content) ()

The notification MUST NOT be sent before the success response has been sent to the user agent that initiated the request.

Headers A resource server MUST include the following header fields in a message/rfc822 formatted PREP notification:

Method

identical to :method pseudo-header field in a HTTP/2 request (), that specifies the request method that triggered the notification.

Date

identical to Date header field in a HTTP response (), that specifies date and time at which the event that triggered the notification was completed.

Event-ID

an opaque identifier for the generated notification.

A resource server SHOULD include the following headers in a message/rfc822 formatted PREP notification when the state of the resource or its representation is modified as a result of the event:

ETag

identical to ETag header field () in a HTTP response. The ETag sent MUST be for the same Content-Type as the representation that was sent in the notification response or that would have been sent in the absense of the Last-Events-ID header.

`PUT` notification message

A resource server MUST include the following headers in a message/rfc822 formatted PREP notification when a request modifies another resource:

Content-Location

identical to the Content-Location header field ().

`POST` notification message modifying another resource

Body The body of a message/rfc822 formatted PREP notification might be used to provide a delta representation, the difference between the state of the representation before and after the most recent event on the resource. If the application client does not specify delta parameter associated with a preferred notifications format of message/rfc822 in the accept event field of the ​request that results in message/rfc822 formatted PREP notifications, the notifications MUST NOT contain a body. If state of the resource is not modified as a result of an HTTP operation, the resulting notification MUST NOT contain a body. If the application client specifies a delta parameter associated with a preferred notifications format of message/rfc822 in the accept event field of the ​request that results in message/rfc822 formatted PREP notifications, a resource server:

• SHOULD send the delta representation as the body of the notification generated upon a PATCH () operation.
• MAY send the delta representation as the body of the notification generated upon a PUT () or a POST () operation.

A resource server SHOULD send the delta representation in the content-type preferred by the client as specified by the delta parameter.

`PATCH` notification with delta representation --random-boundary ]]>

Implementation Guidance A Connect/Express style middleware for parsing the Accept-Events header field is available at https://github.com/CxRes/express-accept-events/ and can be installed from npm as express-accept-events. Complementing this is a Connect/Express style middleware that negotiates an appropriate notifications protocol on the resource based on the request made using the Accept-Event header field, available at https://github.com/CxRes/express-negotiate-events/ and can be installed from npm as express-negotiate-events. An early implementation of the Per Resource Events Protocol, also in the form of a Connect/Express style middleware, is available at https://github.com/CxRes/express-prep/ and can be installed from npm as express-prep. Express Accept Events, Express Negotiate Events and Express PREP are Free and Open Source Software, released under the Mozilla Public License v2.0. The W3C Solid Community Group is developing a specification called Solid-PREP that defines representation and semantics for PREP notifications sent from LDP Resources hosted on Solid storage. This specification enables Solid servers to incorporate the Per Resource Events as a means for sending notifications. Solid-PREP is available at https://solid.github.io/solid-prep/protocol/ and is released under the W3C Software and Document license - version 2023. The Node Solid Server, an open source server that implements the Solid Protocol, implements the Per Resource Events Protocol and Solid-PREP at https://github.com/nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server/tree/basic-prep. It is available for testing on the Solid community test server at https://solidcommunity.net:8443. The PREP Fetch https://github.com/CxRes/prep-fetch/ library provides a convinient way to consume fetch respsones containing PREP notification. PREP Fetch itself is a thin wrapper on top of Multipart Fetch https://github.com/CxRes/multipart-fetch/ that streams the parts of a multipart response as a series of Fetch Responses. PREP Fetch and Multipart Fetch are Free and Open Source Software, released under the Mozilla Public License v2.0.

Security Considerations Since the Per Resource Events Protocol uses HTTP to transmit notifications, it follows that the security and privacy considerations that apply to HTTP also apply to PREP. Considerations relevant to HTTP semantics and its use for transferring information over the Internet are discussed in , and considerations related to HTTP/1.1 message syntax and parsing are discussed in . The following is a non-exhaustive list of security and privacy considerations that become especially pertinent due to the manner in which PREP uses HTTP for transmitting notifications:

Browser Fingerprinting The Accept-Events header field provides an extra vector that can aid unique identification of user agent. Follow the advice in to minimize the risk of fingerprinting.

Denial-of-Service Attacks Resources that serve notifications, by virtue of keeping the response stream open for an extended period of time are more susceptible to Denial-of-Service attacks because the effort required to request notifications from the same resource is tiny compared to the time, memory, and bandwidth consumed by attempting to serve the notifications. Servers ought to ignore, coalesce, or reject egregious notification request, such as repeated notification requests to resource from the same origin.

IANA Considerations The change controller for the following registrations is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".

Header Field Registration IANA has registered the following entry in the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Field Name Registry" defined by :

Header Field Names	Status	Reference
Accept-Events	Provisional
Events	Provisional

Notifications Protocol Registry The Accept-Events and Events header fields identify specific protocols for notifications. The "HTTP Notifications Protocol Registry", created and maintained by IANA at https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters/, registers identifiers for notification protocols. Notifications protocol registrations MUST include the following fields:

• Identifier
• Name
• Pointer to specification text

Initial registrations are given below:

Identifier	Name	Reference
PREP	Per Resource Events Protocol	This document

Values to be added to this namespace require IETF Review (see ). Identified protocols MUST conform to the purpose of sending notifications as defined in of this document.

References Normative References This document describes how delta encoding can be supported as a compatible extension to HTTP/1.1. [STANDARDS-TRACK] The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document describes the overall architecture of HTTP, establishes common terminology, and defines aspects of the protocol that are shared by all versions. In this definition are core protocol elements, extensibility mechanisms, and the "http" and "https" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes. This document updates RFC 3864 and obsoletes RFCs 2818, 7231, 7232, 7233, 7235, 7538, 7615, 7694, and portions of 7230. This document describes a set of data types and associated algorithms that are intended to make it easier and safer to define and handle HTTP header and trailer fields, known as "Structured Fields", "Structured Headers", or "Structured Trailers". It is intended for use by specifications of new HTTP fields. This document obsoletes RFC 8941. This specification nominates a selection of existing HTTP fields as having syntax that is compatible with Structured Fields, so that they can be handled as such (subject to certain caveats). To accommodate some additional fields whose syntax is not compatible, it also defines mappings of their semantics into new Structured Fields. It does not specify how to negotiate their use. This second document defines the general structure of the MIME media typing system and defines an initial set of media types. [STANDARDS-TRACK] Several applications extending the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) require a feature to do partial resource modification. The existing HTTP PUT method only allows a complete replacement of a document. This proposal adds a new HTTP method, PATCH, to modify an existing HTTP resource. [STANDARDS-TRACK] Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use constants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance describing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as when and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Considerations is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of a registry. This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 5226. The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document specifies the HTTP/1.1 message syntax, message parsing, connection management, and related security concerns. This document obsoletes portions of RFC 7230. This specification describes an optimized expression of the semantics of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), referred to as HTTP version 2 (HTTP/2). HTTP/2 enables a more efficient use of network resources and a reduced latency by introducing field compression and allowing multiple concurrent exchanges on the same connection. This document obsoletes RFCs 7540 and 8740. In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings. Informative References Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine This document specifies "Alternative Services" for HTTP, which allow an origin's resources to be authoritatively available at a separate network location, possibly accessed with a different protocol configuration. Applications often use HTTP as a substrate to create HTTP-based APIs. This document specifies best practices for writing specifications that use HTTP to define new application protocols. It is written primarily to guide IETF efforts to define application protocols using HTTP for deployment on the Internet but might be applicable in other situations. This document obsoletes RFC 3205.

Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to Tim Berners-Lee for his recommendation to the IRTF for the Diversity Travel Grant that allowed me to first present this draft at IETF 118. I would like to thank IRTF, and in particular, the selection committee for the Diversity Travel Grants for sponsoring my visit to the co-located IRTF and IETF meetings in Prague. I would also like to acknowledge the help and guidance from Dhruv Dhody that allowed me to make the trip. I would like to thank Alain Bourgeois for his continued help in implementing the Per Resource Events Protocol in the Node Solid Server. I am also grateful to the Solid community for their support and encouragement of this work.